Note that the CO2 emanating from dry ice can create acidic conditions which can impact FMD virus survival. Only use wet ice or ice packs for shipping FMD specimens to a diagnostic laboratory.
Submission during an FMD outbreak
Submission during routine disease investigation
To maximize the likelyhood of arriving at diagnosis, always conduct a full post-mortem where possible and submit fresh or frozen tissues for culture and fixed tissues for histological examinations.
Tissue samples should include teat skin; tonsil (P)* ; lymph nodes - submandibular (P), prescapular (B), pleural (O/C), mesenteric; spleen; liver; kidney; lung; heart; piece of terminal ileum and ileo-coecal valve (5cm long and tied off at both ends); half brain (sagitally cut); mammary (O/C) and any observed gross lesion.
Blood samples should include 10 ml serum; 10 ml EDTA and 6 air dried smears fixed in 70% alcohol. Other samples include nasal and tracheal swabs in transport media (B, O/C); body cavity fluids; infected joints fluid (P)
* (B=bovine; P=porcine; O/C=ovine/caprine).
Laboratory tests
Diagnosis of FMD for the index case is by demonstration of FMD viral antigen (double antibody sandwich ELISA) and/or virus isolation or nucleic acid specific to FMD in samples of tissue or fluid. Detection of specific humoral antibody can also be used for diagnosis, but results should be interpreted carefully for the index case.
For cases subsequent to the index case, the DAS-ELISA and real time or conventional PCR will be the main diagnostic methods. Virus isolation will be important for subsequent epidemiological investigation.
The laboratory tests currently available at NC-FAD are shown in Table 1 and include the double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA), virus isolation, real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). The serological tests are the solid phase 3ABCcompetitive ELISA and the serum neutralization test.
The time needed to confirm the diagnosis of the index case will depend on the quantity, the quality and the type of sample received by the laboratory. Sample types include: vesicular fluid, epithelial tissues and oro-pharyngeal fluid (probang). Good quality fluid collected from vesicles is ideal, but from a practical point of view difficult to obtain. Epithelial tags collected from the edges of ruptured vesicles are the more likely sample the field staff will submit. Ideally these tissues should be clean and relatively fresh and the oral tissues should be separated from the foot lesions.
The preferred procedure for the detection of FMD viral antigen and identification of viral serotype is the DAS-ELISA. However, a negative test result may be obtained when a specimen is from an old lesion, or is too small, or contains too little antigen to be detected. The method used to determine whether any infectious virus is present is to attempt virus isolation by inoculating and passaging the original tissue suspension through susceptible cell cultures, and looking for a cytopathic effect.
Detection of specific sequences of the virus nucleic acid can be attempted by real time PCR by using generic primers targeting the 3D gene (RNA polymerase) of the virus.
FMD virus infection can be diagnosed by the detection of a specific antibody response. Virus neutralization (VN) is used as serotype specific serological tests. On the other hand the 3ABC competitive ELISA is serotype independent and can be used to detect the immune response in any FMD susceptible species. VN test depend on cell culture systems and are therefore more prone to variability than ELISAs. Generally, antibodies to the whole virus appear in serum 7-10 days after infection.
Once the NC-FAD has isolated a FMDV, it will be forwarded to the FMD World Reference Laboratory at the Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, UK for conducting molecular typing and providing advice on the selection of the antigen in the vaccine bank or from another source. Molecular typing is not required to initiate the control measures.
Table 1 Diagnostic test currently available at NC-FAD for FMD
| Test | Specimen required | Test detects | Time taken (to obtain result*) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virus isolation | Tissues | Virus | 2-4 days |
| DAS-ELISA | Epithelial tissue or vesicular fluids | Antigen and serotype identification | 4-5 hours |
| Real time RT-PCR | Tissues | Viral RNA | 4-5 hours |
| Solid-phase 3ABC competitive ELISA | Serum | Specific antibody | 3 hours |
| Virus neutralization | Serum | Specific antibody | 2-3 days |
* Represents only the actual test time. Time in sampling processing, repeat and reporting is not included. A complete turn around time (TAT) is available in the CFIA laboratory test TAT.
Click on image for larger view

Diagnostic Procedure
Note: To be verified by AERT C&D supervisors.
Varying the pH of the environment of the virus outside of the range pH 5-10 is a practical method of destroying the FMD virus. Virus sensitivity is marked in the acid range and for this reason weak acids can be used in many situations.
(Adapted from AUSVETPLAN - Tables 2.8 and 4.0.)
Note: Dilution rates for use against FMD relate to effectiveness when applied to a clean surface. A dirty surface must be cleaned before it can be satisfactorily disinfected because the dirt may make the disinfectant useless. Ensure that the surface or material is:
| Disinfectant Group | Form (usual) | Strength of Usual Dilution (final concentration) | Strength of Final Dilution (weight/volume) | Contact Time | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acids: | |||||
| Citric acid | powder | 2 grams/litre | 0.2% (weight/volume) | 30 minutes | Safe for clothes & body decontamination. Especially useful for FMD virus decontamination. |
| Acetic Acid (household vinegar) | liquid | 4% | 2% | 30 minutes | Similar uses to above but mildly corrosive. |
| Hydrochloric acid | Concent acid (10 Mole) | 1:50 | 2% (weight/volume) | 10 minutes | Used only when better disinfectants not available. Corrisive for many metals and concrete. |
| Oxidizing Agents: | |||||
| Virkon * | powder | 20 grams/litre | 2% (weight/volume) | 10 minutes | Excellent disinfectant for use on animals, human housing, machinery, vehicles, aircraft and clothing. |
| Sodium hypochlorite NaOC1 (household bleach) | conc. liquid (5.25% available chlorine) | 1:10 | 5.25% available chlorine (52,500 ppm) | 10-30 minutes | Effective for animals and clothing, except when in the presence of organic material. Less stable in warm, sunny conditions above 15ºC. |
| Calcium hypochlorite Ca(OC1)2 | solid | 30 grams/litre | 2-3% available chlorine (20,000 - 30,000 ppm) | 10-30 minutes | Effective for animals and clothing, except when in the presence of organic material. Less stable in warm, sunny conditions above 15ºC. |
| Alkalis: (Do not use in the presence of aluminium and derived alloys.) | |||||
| Sodium hydroxide | pellets | 20 grams/litre | 2% (weight/volume) | 10 minutes | Very effective for use in the environment, on animals, water tanks, dams. |
| Sodium carbonate - anhydrous (Na2CO3) - washing soda (Na2 CO3 .10H2O) |
powder
crystals |
40 grams/litre
100 g/litre |
4% (weight/volume)
10% (weight/volume) |
10 minutes
30 minutes |
Recommended for use in the presence of high concentrations of organic material. |
| Aldehydes: | |||||
| Formalin | 40% formaldehyde | 0.05 | 8% (weight/volume) | 10-30 minutes | Use on feed contaminated with FMD disinfectant releases irritating, toxic gas. |
| Formaldehyde gas | Paraform aldehyde powder* | 1 gram/cubic foot | 15-24 hours | Toxic gas, recommended only if other methods of decontamination cannot be used. |
Notes:
(From OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2005), Appendix 3.6.2
Inactivation of the virus in meat (Article 3.6.2.1)
1. Canning - Meat is subjected to heat treatment in hermetically sealed container to reach an internal core temperature of at least 70°C for a minimum of 30 minutes.
2. Thorough cooking - Meat previously deboned and defatted shall be subjected to heating so that an internal temperature of 70°Cor greater is maintained for a minimum of 30 minutes. After cooking, it shall be packed and handled in such a way that it cannot be exposed to a source of virus.
3. Drying after salting - When rigor mortis is complete, the meat must be deboned, salted with cooking salt (NaCl) and completely dried. It must not deteriorate at ambient temperature. "Drying" is defined in terms of ratio between water and protein which must not be greater than 2.25:1.
Inactivation of the virus in animal products
Wool & hair (Article 3.6.2.2)
For inactivation of viruses present in wool and hair for industrial use, one of the following procedures should be used:
1. industrial washing, which consists of the immersion of the wool in a series of baths of water, soap and sodium hydroxide (NaOH or soda) or potassium hydroxide (KOH or potash);
2. chemical depilation by means of slaked lime or sodium sulphide;
3. fumigation in formaldehyde in a hermetically sealed chamber for 24 hours. A common practical method of accomplishing this objective is to add commercial formalin (53 ml) to potassium permanganate (35g per cubic metre). Warning: the reaction between formalin and potassium permanganate is quite violent and generates a considerable amount of heat. For that reason, plastic and polyethylene containers should not be used and protective clothing, including goggles, are essential. The operator should also ensure a rapid exit from the room is possible. Good ventilation of the room is also essential after the fumigation. A safer fumigation method is to use the automatic formalin generators (Certek) from paraformaldehyde with neutralization with ammonium carbonate;
4. industrial scouring which consists in the immersion of wool in a water-soluble detergent held at 60-70°C;
5. storage of wool at 18°C for 4 weeks, or 4°C or 4 months or 37°C for 8 days.
Bristles (Article 3.6.2.3)
For inactivation of viruses present in bristles for industrial use, one of the following procedures should be used:
1. boiling for at least 1 hour;
2. immersion for at least 24 hours in a 1% solution of formaldehyde prepared from 30 ml of commercial formalin per litre of water.
Raw hides and skins (Article 3.6.2.4)
For the inactivation of viruses present in raw hide and skins for industrialized use, the following procedure should be used: salting for at least 28 days in sea salt containing 2% sodium carbonate.
Milk or cream for human consumption (Article 3.6.2.5)
For inactivation of viruses present in milk and cream for human consumption, one of the following procedures should be used:
1. A sterilisation process applying a minimum temperature of 132°C for at least 1 second (Ultra High Temperature [UHT];
2. If the milk has a pH less than 7.0, a sterilisation process applying a minimum temperature of 72°C for at least 15 seconds (high temperature-short time pasteurization simple HTST); or
3. If the milk has a pH of 7.0 or over, the HTST process is applied twice.
Milk for animal consumption (Article 3.6.2.6)
For the inactivation of viruses present in milk for animal consumption, one of the following procedures should be used:
1. Double High Temperature Short Time (HTST) pasteurisation (72°C for at least 15 seconds);
2. HTST combined with another physical treatment e.g. maintaining a pH 6 for at least one hour or additional heating to at least 72ºC combined with desiccation;
3. Ultra-high temperature (UHT) combined with another physical treatment referred to in point 2 above.
Disinfection of Skins and Trophies (Article 3.6.2.7)
For the inactivation of viruses present in skins and trophies from wild animals susceptible to FMD, one of the following procedures should be used prior to complete taxidermal treatment:
1. boiling in water for an appropriate time to ensure that any matter other than bone, horns, hooves, claws, antlers or teeth is removed;
2. gamma irradiation at a dose at least 20 kilogray at room temperature (20°C or higher);
3. soaking with agitation in 4% (weight/volume) solution of washing soda (sodium carbonate - Na2 CO3) maintained at pH 11.5 or above for at least 48 hours;
4. soaking with agitation, in a formic acid solution (100 kg of salt [NaCl] and 12 kg of formic acid per 1000 litres of water) maintained at below pH 3.0 for at least 48 hours; wetting and dressing agents may be added;
5. for raw hides, salting for at least 28 days with sea salt containing 2% washing soda (sodium carbonate - Na2 CO3).
Practical Field Inactivation (not in OIE Code)
Acid Treatment
The addition of acid to reduce the pH below 4:
Because the milk will curd, do not undertake this activity while milk is in the bulk tank. Open tanks or containers will facilitate the disposal.
Other Disinfectants
To add another disinfectant, see Appendix 2.
When acid treatment is employed, the resulting mix of milk and acid will be agitated and held for one hour. Milk to which acid has been added can be pH verified using pH assay strips.
Movement control is described in the Procedures in the control area (4.6) and the Control Area Regulations Section 80 (under preparation). Transmission can be effected directly by animal movement or indirectly by fomites or things such as animal products, waste, animals, people etc. Means of transmission can be placed into logical groupings and assigned a risk (low, medium, or high) according to the innate ability to contain, sustain and transmit FMD virus. Movements are classified for epidemiological purposes based on the origin and destination, risk category of item, direction of movement, effectiveness of treatment, welfare and fate of risk good once moved.
Table (list) I: Definition of risk categories
High Risk
Medium Risk
Low Risk
Table II: Table of permit decision rules based on the source of the movement, the conveyor type, and the direction of the intended movement.
| Risk | Destination |
Source of requested movement Suspect Infected Places & Infected Zone |
Source of requested movement Other Premises in Restricted Zone |
Source of requested movement Premises outside Control Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Within CA Into CA Out of CA |
Prohibited except slaughter Not applicable Prohibited |
Permitted with conditions Not applicable Prohibited except to slaughter |
Not applicable Permit-not to suspect IPs Not applicable |
| Medium | Within CA Into CA Out of CA |
Permitted with conditions Not applicable Prohibited |
Permitted with conditions Not applicable Permitted with conditions |
Not applicable Permit-not to suspect IPs Not applicable |
| Low | Within CA Into CA Out of CA |
Permitted with conditions Not applicable Permitted with conditions |
No permit required Not applicable No permit required |
Not applicable No permit Not applicable |
* Note: all places in the infected zone are suspect infected places.
Table (list) III: Summary Table of Permits
Infected Zone
Restricted Zone
1. Animals
1.1 Movement out of susceptible animals
1.2 Movement in of susceptible animals
1.3 Movement of other non-susceptible livestock/Control of domestic pets
1.4 Movement out of dead animals
1.5 Movement out of animals to slaughter (no abattoir in infected/restricted zone)
In the absence of an abattoir in the control area, live FMD susceptible animals can be transported under permit to the nearest abattoir in a free zone for immediate slaughter only under the following conditions:
2. People and Vehicles
2.1 Movement of people - in & out
2.2 Movement of vehicles - in & out
3. Animal Service Industries
3.1 Movement of Sevices-veterinarians/AI inseminators/feed compagnies - in & out
4. Abattoirs & Animal Products Including Milk
4.1 Abattoir Operation
4.2 Movement of fresh/frozen meat from susceptible animals
4.3 Movement of abattoir waste/rendering
4.4 Movement out of susceptible animal by-products (hides etc.)
By-products from susceptible animals originating within the infected zone must be treated (see Appendix 3) can move under permit
Allowed within control area unless treated (see Appendix 3) then may move out under permit.
4.5 Movement of Milk
5. Germplas
5.1 Artificial insemination, embryo collection and transfer centres
6. Animal By-Products
6.1 Movement of litter & manure
7. Feed & Equipment
7.1 Movement of Feed & Equipment
8. Special Premises
8.1 Susceptible animals Assembly points (stockyards, auction markets, sales, fairs, zoos)
8.2 Edible Residual Material Feeders (Swill Feeders)
9. Transportation Through Zone
9.1 Transportation of susceptible animals through zone
10. Susceptible Wildlife
10.1 Control of susceptible wildlife
Table IV: Comparison Table of Zones – OIE/Canada/EU
| OIE AH Code 2007 | Canada | European Union |
|---|---|---|
| Infected Zone: means a zone in which the absence of the disease under consideration has not been demonstrated by the requirements specified in the Terrestrial Code being met. |
Control Area: means an area legally defined under Section 27 (1) of the Health of Animal Act, and referred to in the Ministerial declaration which incorporates all infected places and within which movement restrictions and emergency eradication measured are authorized. It may be subdivided into designated zones as per Section 80 of the Health of Animal Regulation. Infected Zone: The zone estabished pursuant to the Health of Animals Regulations Section 80 which includes all positive FAD premises. The outer boundary is determined by the epidemiology of the disease adjusted to the environment. different ecological and geographic factors and types of animals husbandry being practiced and resources to control the epidemic. Movement of susceptible livestock must be strictly controlles. The EU standard for their equivalent Protection Zone of 3 km may be applied. Restricted Zone: An area measured from the infected premises and surrounding the infected zone. The boundaries will be defined by the physical and geographic features. Both the restricted and the security zones are based on ecological and goegraphical factors and types of animal husbandry being practiced and resources. Movement of susceptible livestock and animal product are controlled. The EU equivalent to the Restricted zone is the Surveillance zone with a standard of 10 km. Security Zone: The geographic area between the perimeter of the Infected zone and the Restricted zone to the edge of the Control area. Both the Restricted and Security zones based on ecological and geographic factors as well as all the epidemiological factors and types of animal husbandry being practiced and resources. Movement of susceptible livestock and animal product are controlled. |
Protected Zone: based on a minimum radius of 3 km around the infected holding and must take account of natural boundaries, supervision of facilities and possible dispersion of virus by air or other means. A census of all the holding with periodic veterinary inspection. Stringent movement controls will be applied to animals of susceptible species, including animals moving into or out of the zone (fairs, markets, shows or other animal gatherings of os susceptible animals shall be prohibited). Controls will be placed on service for breeding and artificial insemination. Surveillance Zone: based on a minimum radius of 10 km around the infected holding and must take account of natural boundaries, supervision facilities and possible dispension of virus by air or other means. The measures employed within the surveillance zone are similar (although a little less stringent in movement controls) to the Protection zone. Further measures also require surveillance within the zone to be carried out for specified time frames following destruction of animals of susceptible species. |
| Buffer Zone: means a zone established to protect the health status of animals in a free country or free zone, from those in a country or zone of a different animal health status, using measured based on the epidemiology of the disease under consideration to prevent spread of the causative pathogenic agent into a free country or free zone. These measures may include, but are not limited to vaccination, movement control and an intensified degree of disease surveillance. | Restricted Zone: Establishment of Restricted Zone Article 43 Establishment of restricted zones in cases ou outbreaks of LPAI immediately following an outbreak of LPAI, the competent authority shall establish a restricted zone with a radius of at least one kilometre around the holding. | |
|
Surveillance Zone: means a zone established within, and along the border of a free zone separeting the free zone from an infected zone. The surveillance zone should have an intensified degree of surveillance. Free Zone: means a zone in which the absence of the disease under consideration has been demonstrated by the requirements specified in the Terrestrial Code for free status being met. Within the zone and at its borders, appropriate offical veterinary control is effectively applied for animals and animal products, and their transportation. |
Free Zone: means a zone in which the absence of the disease under consideration has been demonstrated by the requirements specified in the Terrestrial Code for free status being met. Within the zone and at its borders, appropriate offical veterinary control is effectively applied for animals and animal products, and their transportation. | Free Zone: means a zone in which the absence of the disease under consideration has been demonstrated by the requirements specified in the Terrestrial Code for free status being met. Within the zone and at its borders, appropriate offical veterinary control is effectively applied for animals and animal products, and their transportation. |
Figure 1: Canadian Zones
Sampling requirements to meet the statistical significance suggested by international standards will need to be added for transmittal to the field staff. It is recommended that this Appendix be written by the team of epidemiologists that will build the rationale for recognition of FMD freedom by the international trading partners.
The sampling protocols for surveillance during and after the outbreak within the control area as well as in the FMD-free zone need to be added to build the argument for trade from the unaffected parts of the country. When to initiate surveillance both within the control area as well as in the FMD free zone, determine the confidence and the prevalence criteria if different from 95% and 1%. The OIE standard calls for 95% level of confidence at a 20% prevalence. The European Commission states 95% / 2%. It is recommended that this Appendix be written by the team of epidemiologists who will be building the rationale in support of a recognition of freedom from the trading partners.
Previous Page: Glossary and Acronyms
Introduction & Table of Contents | Plan 1 | Plan 2 | Plan 3 | Plan 4 | Plan 5
Plan 6 | Glossary and Acronyms | Appendices