Program Activity - Food Safety and Nutrition Risks
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Develop and initiate implementation of the GoC's proposed FCSAP. |
Broaden the coverage of potentially unsafe food imports. Modernize and streamline inspection systems. |
The CFIA developed and initiated implementation of strategies for a food safety system for the Non-Federally Registered Sector including:
|
|
Enhance authority to require industry to implement food safety controls to prevent problems. Create a specific prohibition against tampering with food. Provide new authority to require adequate records be kept by those who handle food. |
Work was undertaken in collaboration with HC to amend the Food and Drugs Act via Bill C-51. The Bill was deferred, pending further analysis/resolution of questions surrounding Natural Health Products. |
|
|
Strengthen the Government’s authority to verify the safety of food at all points in the food continuum, including prior to importation into Canada. Strengthen access to the information that is needed in order to effectively respond to identified problems. |
The CFIA initiated preliminary work toward the development of business and systems models for the implementation of an importer licensing/registration system including:
|
|
| Continue to promote the acceptance and implementation of Good Importing Practices by industry. | The CFIA continued to promote importer licensing and the implementation of Good Importing Practices. | |
| Assemble a team and develop an overall food safety research plan under the Food Safety Research Strategy. | The CFIA developed and implemented a research process in consultation with clients, including a plan for food safety research. This plan includes procedures for prioritizing research projects. A committee of experts was established to review all submissions and finalize which research was to be funded based on immediate priorities. In addition to these activities, the CFIA funded eighty-five food research/method development projects. Project successes included better detection methods, the development of methods to detect new areas requiring testing for regulatory purposes, improvement in service delivery through more efficient methods and reductions in testing time. | |
| Encourage industry to maximize its role in the food safety system and to take a more hands-on approach in satisfying its responsibility for meeting regulatory requirements. | Encourage industry to develop and implement quality management systems and self-monitor its performance on an ongoing basis. | The Food Safety Enhancement Initiative is currently being reviewed and updated to make it less prescriptive and more customized toward individual commodity groups. In addition, the CFIA continued the development and implementation of the CVS, which involves communication and consultation with industry. Through the implementation of mandatory HACCP in meat and fish, industry is obliged to maintain quality systems which involve self-monitoring on an ongoing basis and these controls are evaluated through the CVS. For those inspection programs where HACCP is not mandatory, industry's roles and responsibilities for complying with regulations and producing safe food are reinforced through the CVS. |
| Continue advancing a key inspection initiative, Meat Inspection Reform48, which is part of the government-wide priority linked to modernization of the regulatory framework. | Finalize consultative activities on the Canadian Meat Hygiene Standard and supporting assessment criteria. | Work towards this sub-commitment was deferred for 2008-09. |
| Commence amendments to the Meat Inspection Regulations. | The CFIA pursues regulatory maintenance work on an ongoing basis. Policy work to support a number of amendments to the Meat Inspection Regulations was undertaken with regards to room temperatures and kidneys in poultry. | |
| Verify and validate tasks, policies and procedures under the CVS. | The CFIA reviewed tasks, policies and procedures to ensure they accurately reflected regulations. | |
| Consult on the final Poultry Rejection Policy, develop and implement a training strategy and target establishment implementation of the policy. |
The CFIA completed policy and training materials. Implementation was delayed pending a third-party review of data from pilot projects. |
|
| Complete implementation of the Modernization of Poultry Inspection Program (MPIP). | The CFIA has fully implemented the MPIP in twenty-six poultry establishments and implementation is in progress in nine other establishments. | |
| The CFIA will continue working with the provinces and territories on the On-Farm Food Safety (OFFS) Recognition Program, which formally recognizes OFFS programs developed by national producer organizations. Government recognition of HACCP-based OFFS programs may enhance Canada's domestic and international reputation as a leader in food safety and quality, which could result in expanded markets for Canadian products. |
The CFIA, in collaboration with HC, provincial governments and national producer organizations, finalized the OFFS Recognition Program, Policy and Protocol documents. These documents provide the guidance necessary for industry’s OFFS programs to be recognized by government. The CFIA also continued to work with other federal departments, such as HC, and the Provinces in the technical review of national producer organizations’ on-farm food safety programs. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue to issue public warnings within 24 hours of Class I recall decisions. | 99.55 per cent of all public warnings for Class I recalls were issued within 24 hours of the recall decision. | |
| Develop an action plan to enhance the food safety system, particularly as it relates to foodborne illness investigation and response. | The CFIA continued to develop its action plan to enhance food safety as it relates to foodborne illness investigations. | |
| Continue to work within the context of the GoC’s PSAT initiative to prepare for, and respond to, food safety threats and incidents. | Maintain the capacity to respond to emergencies by strengthening surveillance, detection, science, and laboratory capacity. | The CFIA continued to maintain its capacity to respond to emergencies by funding projects to strengthen methodologies to respond to emergencies, developing more rapid methods for the detection of food pathogens and increasing surveillance for foodborne pathogens through a higher number of samples. |
| Continue to evaluate alternative methodologies to reduce testing time. | CFIA laboratories have successfully evaluated and developed alternative methodologies to reduce testing time. Successes include modifying current rapid methodology for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes, and the adaptation/modification of methods for use with difficult matrices. | |
| Update and exercise response plans. | The CFIA continued to update and exercise its response plans including business continuity plans and containment guidelines. | |
| Respond to outbreaks of foodborne illness. | The CFIA continued to issue public warnings for food recalls and updated its public internet website accordingly. | |
| Have systems in place to respond to emergencies such as disease outbreaks. |
The CFIA refined and communicated the process and criteria for activating Emergency Operations Centres and Emergency Response Teams. The Agency also provided training in the Incident Command System for staff involved in food safety incidents. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Launch an advertising campaign to increase awareness of and promote the CFIA’s food recall system and advisory services to Canadians. | The CFIA developed a food safety insert that was distributed through 54 newspapers resulting in 2081 new subscribers to the recall advisory subscription list. In addition, the Agency conducted a joint outreach campaign with the PHAC and an outreach campaign to health and education organizations. | |
| Continue the outreach campaign to international travellers to raise awareness of the need to declare all food, plants and animals when returning to Canada. | The CFIA developed the “Be Aware and Declare!” advertisements for Customs areas of Canada’s international airports, developed a training video for border security officers and successfully invited 12 international airlines to participate in the Travellers’ Biosecurity “Be Aware and Declare!” campaign. | |
| Develop food safety-related communications, including print publications and website updates to provide information and educational materials on food safety risks and measures. |
The CFIA worked with various government partners, including HC, the PHAC, AAFC and the Canadian Partnership for Food Safety Education, in the development of a public awareness campaign implemented in cooperation with various Canadian grocery store chains, as well as other food safety information initiatives. |
|
| Advance food safety displays in public fairs and exhibitions targeting consumers and food industry. | The Agency distributed food safety publications and resources at 17 public food safety exhibitions and fairs across Canada attracting over 2.9 million Canadians. | |
| Advance Labelling as a Public Health Tool policy framework to support regulatory initiatives such as nutrition labelling, discretionary food fortification, allergen labelling, and safe handling and cooking labelling. | Work with HC to develop and implement a staged compliance strategy. | The CFIA worked closely with HC to complete the regulatory package for Enhanced Labelling for Food Allergen and Gluten Sources and Added Sulphites for pre-publication in the Canada Gazette, Part 1, on July 26, 2008. |
| Develop an effective compliance and enforcement approach to mandatory allergen labelling. |
The CFIA and HC formed a working group to review the feedback received during the comment period for the proposed amendments to finalize the allergen regulations for publication by January 2010 and began development of its compliance and enforcement approach. |
|
| Further implement the nutrition labelling regulations and monitor compliance on a risk-based priority and sectoral approach. | The CFIA continued to promote and monitor compliance with the nutrition labelling regulations. | |
|
Train inspection and headquarters staff on the interpretation and enforcement of the regulations. Develop and disseminate plain language and interpretive documents to help industry understand and comply with the regulations. |
As the amendment to the regulations has not yet been finalized and the compliance and enforcement approach has not yet been fully developed, training materials and interpretive documents have also not yet been completed. |
Program Activity - Zoonotic Risk
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Establish electronic links with the Public Health Laboratory Network and the U.S. Animal Health Laboratory Network to collect data in real time for direct input to the CAHSN. | An information sharing link has been established between the CAHSN and the U.S. Animal Health Laboratory Network as part of the Quadrilateral Laboratory Network group formed in 2008. The first meeting of Canada, the U.S., Australia and New Zealand was hosted by the National Centre for Foreign Animal Diseases (NCFAD) in Winnipeg in April 2008. The NCFAD collaborates on diagnostics with the National U.S. Animal Health Laboratory Network, with the goal of a future direct electronic link between the two organizations. | |
| Continue working toward a national early warning system for animal disease threats to the food supply, food safety or public health. |
Several ongoing initiatives within the CFIA support early detection and response to animal disease threats. These include the Agency’s continued involvement and support of the CAHSN, a nation-wide surveillance network which focuses on early detection of animal disease threats that could have zoonotic potential, Animal Health Foresight, which will be applied to planning and priority setting for future capabilities required for animal health emergency management and the Agency’s partnerships with the PHAC in the implementation of collaborative projects to address zoonotic diseases. In addition, through working with its partners, the Agency conducted regular scanning of the literature to identify, analyze and share information related to potential animal disease threats, threats to Canada's food supply, food safety and public health. Ten Science Scan reports were issued. |
|
| Work toward establishing a federal-provincial laboratory network for the rapid diagnosis of serious infectious animal diseases. |
The CFIA’s Winnipeg laboratory has provided training and reagents to provincial partners on animal health diseases that are targeted for joint surveillance. Several contribution agreements for upgrading provincial laboratory capabilities were completed. A communications template was developed for use in the event of a serious disease finding in an external laboratory. |
|
| An information-sharing network linking federal and provincial agencies and departments of animal and human health. | Federal and provincial animal health data capture for the CAHSN is being piloted using the PHAC's Canadian National Public Health Information data platforms. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue to work towards the eradication of BSE from the national cattle herd. | Collaborate with federal and provincial partners, international trading partners, international standard-setting bodies, the Canadian Cattle Identification Agency and regulated parties. | Work is ongoing to contribute to the analysis of issues and development of strategies with stakeholders to further develop Canada's traceability system. |
| Put in place measures that are science-based and internationally recognized as effective ways to prevent BSE transmission. | The CFIA established an audit for specified risk material (SRM) permitting, improved the process for permitting to allow movement of SRM in Canada, and implemented an inspection program to verify compliance with the Enhanced Feed Ban. | |
| Undertake a review of the CFIA’s BSE surveillance activities to ensure that they continue to meet the OIE requirements in a cost effective manner. | The CFIA reviewed its BSE surveillance activities and distributed the results. | |
| Continue to advance work under the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy to provide Canadian leadership on animal and public health issues. |
Collaborate with the PHAC, Public Safety Canada, Environment Canada, and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Focus on collaborative surveillance design for early detection of AI through migratory bird assessments and targeted sampling of domestic populations. |
The CFIA developed research projects focusing on more rapid and accurate diagnostic tests and on vaccines for AI. The CFIA contributed full-time secretarial support to assist the Pandemic Planning. The Agency also continued its ongoing contribution to the analysis of issues and development of strategies with stakeholders to further develop Canada’s traceability system. The CFIA developed and implemented a domestic surveillance regime that was designed to meet the standards of trading partners. |
Program Activity - Animal Health Risks and Production Systems
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue recruiting, hiring and training veterinarians for the CVR. |
The CFIA trained individual veterinarians who may be called upon in the event of an international animal health incident. A Recognition and Initial Response course was held from January 27 to February 5, 2009, attended by 30 participants. The CFIA also developed an e-Learning module that includes Orientation to Outbreak Response for training of new CFIA hires and participants in the CVR. |
|
| Partner with the CBSA and the Canadian Wildlife Service to establish networks of experts in various fora to ensure timely detection of and response to emerging diseases. | The CFIA continued to partner with the CBSA and the Canadian Wildlife Service to identify events and circumstances that could have potential negative consequences for the domestic animal population. Meetings were increased at the Vice President level and a border lookout issued for AI. | |
| Identify areas for improvement to existing FMD emergency prevention, preparedness and response efforts and focus the risk-based action plan accordingly. | The CFIA completed a Risk Profiling Exercise for the Foot-and-Mouth Disease and, subsequently, developed a risk-based action plan. | |
| Establish steering committees and conduct workshops with stakeholders to further develop the NAHS and related Animal Health Science Foresight. | The CFIA developed and finalized the National Animal Health Science Agenda, engaged with the National Working Group on Future Animal Health Science, and developed the Animal Health System Map and Future scenarios. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Launch the NAHS in collaboration with industry and other federal partners. | The F/P/T Regulatory ADM Committee refocused their efforts toward the development of a National Farmed Animal Health and Welfare Strategy. Phase I of this strategy was completed which included the definition of roles and responsibilities in order to advance production systems and disease control approaches. | |
| Implement the National Wildlife Disease Strategy. | Continue to work with federal, provincial and territorial departments responsible for wildlife, forests, fisheries and aquaculture to establish a coordinated national policy and management framework to respond to and minimize the impacts of animal diseases originating in wildlife. | The CFIA prepared two reports describing Canada’s infrastructure, programs and governance pertaining to national management of animal health, including wildlife disease surveillance. The first report addresses laboratory capacity, surveillance and emergency response programs and activities in support of national animal health, including wildlife surveillance. The second report includes a section describing national wildlife governance, as well provincial legislation pertaining to animal health management, including for wildlife health. |
| Work with the provinces to verify compliance of establishments under provincial jurisdiction with the new requirements of the Enhanced Feed Ban. | The Agency improved the permitting process to allow the movement of Specified Risks Materials (SRM) in Canada, established an audit for SRM permitting, and implemented an inspection program to verify compliance with the enhanced Feed Ban. | |
| Develop the Avian and Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Strategy. | Continue to work with partners. | The CFIA participated in a Public Safety Canada-led exercise of the North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza held jointly with Mexican and U.S. officials. |
| Focus on vaccines and antiviral. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| Focus on surge capacity. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| Focus on prevention and early warning. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| Focus on emergency preparedness. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| Focus on critical science and regulation. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| Focus on risk communications. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| Focus on F/P/T and international collaboration. |
The CFIA undertook the following actions:
|
|
| North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza (NPAPI) | Conduct a joint international avian and pandemic response exercise in cooperation with federal partners and in conjunction with Mexico and the U.S. | Contributed to the design of, and participated in, the tabletop exercise by the NPAPI that aimed at validating the coordination and communications aspects of a response to an avian and/or pandemic influenza incident in North America. |
| Continue contributing to collaborative emergency preparedness research initiatives with the objective to prepare for potential animal disease outbreak emergencies. | The CFIA is leading a project aimed at helping Canada better anticipate, prepare for and respond to future risks to animal health. This project, Fore-CAN: Foresight for Canadian Animal Health, is exploring the application of foresight as a tool for stakeholders to collaboratively develop a shared vision of the future, leading to a collective awareness of capabilities required to manage animal health emergencies. The three-year project is funded by the Centre for Security Science of National Defence and in-kind contributions from partners including the CFIA, AAFC, the PHAC, the Provinces of Ontario and Alberta, Canada’s five veterinary colleges and Dairy Farmers of Canada. |
Program Activity - Plant Health Risks and Production Systems
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Implement systems-based certification programs with the country of origin. | Increase the focus and effort on off-shore risk mitigation for imported plant products before they reach the Canadian border. | No major off-shore audits were conducted in 2008-09. |
| Finalize the Plant Pest Containment Guidelines for facilities handling plant pests to serve as the basis for the CFIA’s approval of medium-to-high-risk containment for facilities and laboratories. | The CFIA finalized and published the first edition of the Containment Standards for Facilities Handling Plant Pests which are being used to assess importing facilities. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue working with partners and stakeholders to improve programs and regulatory frameworks in support of managing risks to the plant resource base by modernizing the agricultural inputs and plant products programs related to plant production systems. | The CFIA continued to modernize the agricultural inputs and plant products programs related to plant production systems. The CFIA continued its activities under the Plant Health and Biosecurity Programs. | |
| Continue to develop a “North American Perimeter Approach” to enhance cooperation to protect plant resources within countries through a collaborative approach towards addressing risks. |
The CFIA completed bilateral work with the USDA to develop harmonized standards where appropriate. The Agency also undertook joint program delivery initiatives off-shore including the Dutch bulb program and a collaborative audit/system review of the AGM program in Asia. |
|
| Continue development of the National Plant Biosecurity Strategy (NPBS). | Continue to work with other government departments and stakeholders. |
The CFIA developed Interdepartmental working groups and action plans (e.g. for terrestrial plants and plant pests). The Agency presented the NPBS to the F/P/T Regulatory ADM Committee and continues to work with its partners to more effectively deliver programs which protect the plant resource base. |
| Continue leading the development of the National Plant Health Co-operation Framework through the outlining of a comprehensive approach in Canada to eradicate, control and manage critical plant pests. | The CFIA signed a MOU with British Columbia in addition to the existing MOUs with Ontario and Quebec. | |
| Continue development of the Plant Health Compensation Framework. |
Reducing the wait time in providing compensation to producers in cases where plant quarantine actions are taken for a specified pest. Clarify the circumstances under which compensation is granted. |
Progress in this area was less than expected due to hiring difficulties relating to the highly specialized nature of this area. |
| Advance the Forestry Research Strategy for Plant Quarantine Pests together with Natural Resources Canada. | The CFIA developed the “CFIA-Canadian Forestry Service (CFS) Five-Year Forestry Research Plan” with a component on Science and Technology Impact Framework. | |
| Advance proactive communications, education and outreach of plant health risks to stakeholders. | The Agency developed and launched a “Don't Move Firewood” campaign. |
Program Activity - Biodiversity Protection
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Advance the Plant Health Program to prevent the spread of invasive alien species. | The CFIA improved the existing knowledge of invasive alien species through research (e.g. sampling and detection of Emerald Ash Borer). | |
| Focus on increasing communication with our regulatory partners as well as regulated parties and the Canadian public. |
The Agency improved communication activities through the implementation of the Bioportal. In addition, the CFIA conducted a total of 77 risk assessments for plants, insects and diseases and provided scientific and technical advice to programs on many issues. As well, the CFIA provided leadership and contributions to PRA and Invasive Alien Species (IAS) panels of the North American Plant Protection Organization to meet panel charges. |
|
| Assess agricultural products, including livestock feeds, supplements, veterinary biologics and seeds to ensure agricultural products are effective and safe and contribute to efficient production, maintenance of healthy livestock and crops, and support food safety. |
Challenges posed by new crops for new uses have been addressed through the development of new risk assessment tools validated through expert consultations. These tools, such as the Canadian Adapted Weed Risk Assessment Tool, have led to timely and accurate border screening of new plants intended for cultivation, resulting in better and more effective service for clients. Biodiversity protection has also been enhanced through the implementation of the CVS for feed, rendering, humane transportation and animal identification. Thorough assessment of these agricultural products is an ongoing core activity of the CFIA and is a continually supported function within the organization. |
|
| Undertake environmental safety assessments of plants with novel traits (PNTs), novel feeds, novel fertilizer supplements, and veterinary biologics (including products of biotechnology) to take into account impacts on biodiversity, sustainability, impacts on non-target organisms and exposure to bystanders. |
The science challenges posed by new crops for new uses have been addressed through the development of new risk assessment tools validated through expert consultations. These tools, such as the Canadian Adapted Weed Risk Assessment Tool, have led to timely and accurate border screening of new plants intended for cultivation, resulting in better and more effective service for clients. Thorough assessment of these novel agricultural products is an ongoing core activity of the CFIA, and is a continually supported function within the organization. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Work with partners and stakeholders to enhance program and regulatory frameworks in support of managing risks to biodiversity as relevant to the plant and animal resource base. | The CFIA continued to work with partners and stakeholders in providing a contribution to the improvement of knowledge regarding regulated pathogens and pests and improvement of detection / identification methodologies through Research & Development (e.g. Potato yellow dwarf virus). | |
| Advance a regulatory modernization initiative for biotechnology whereby collaborative policy discussion and development between all affected federal partners will ensure that a consistent approach to regulatory oversight is taken, duplication eliminated where possible and regulatory gaps are addressed. |
The CFIA participated in GoC meetings on biotechnology such as the Novel Substances Notification Review. The Agency also ensured the perspective of the CFIA was incorporated and represented in the overall GoC discussions on the regulation of products of biotechnology. |
|
| Undertake multi-stakeholder consultations to clarify and update the regulatory requirements for products of biotechnology to ensure that industry has clear guidance as to when a product triggers regulation which regulatory requirements must be met and which regulatory processes must be followed. | The CFIA undertook stakeholder consultation regarding “novelty as a regulatory trigger” for PNTs. The results of this consultation supported the final drafting of the Novelty Directive. | |
| Advance the NPBS. | Strengthen the capacity of an integrated Canadian plant health regulatory system. |
The CFIA drafted regulations and supporting documentation. The CFIA continued to engage in ongoing discussions with Federal-Provincial partners regarding the delivery of the IAS Strategy. The Agency also engaged the F/P/T Regulatory ADM Committee in discussions regarding the NPBS. |
| Strengthen the capacity of Canada’s plant biotechnology regulatory system to support new product innovation while maintaining environmental sustainability and consumer and market confidence. | The CFIA initiated the development of the Contained Commercial Environmental Release guidelines and worked on updating the regulatory framework to reflect new science and ensure processes are science- and risk-based. | |
|
Strengthen and streamline the Canadian seed and fertilizer regulatory framework to support enhanced regulatory compliance. |
||
|
Work continued on the long-term modernization process for the Seed and Fertilizer programs. The CFIA also undertook stakeholder consultations and completed regulatory amendment packages. |
||
| Develop a strong regulatory process in order to prevent potential adverse effects and to ensure that these agricultural inputs do not cause adverse effects when agricultural products are released into the environment. | The CFIA drafted regulations and supporting documentation. | |
| Planned activities for developing the NPBS. | Conduct stakeholder consultations. | The CFIA undertook individual commodity-based consultations throughout the year. |
| Develop an import policy for innovative plant products. | The Agency developed a fact sheet to inform importers of their responsibilities and regulatory oversight of new crop kinds as they pertain to food, feed and environmental safety. | |
| Initiate development of a Plant Health Control and Tracking System (PHCTS) to provide timely and accurate information on plants and plant products, and CFIA activities related to facilitating the movement of goods or preventing the introduction and spread of plant pests. | The CFIA drafted the initial business requirements for the development of the PHCTS. | |
| Establish a coordinated emergency response plan for plant pests and diseases. | Response plans were updated for Emerald Ash Borer, Asian Longhorned Beetle, Brown Spruce Longhorn Beetle, Sudden Oak Death and Potato Cyst Nematode. | |
| Initiate the development of a Canadian Invasive Plant Framework, in collaboration with other government organizations, to clarify roles and responsibilities with respect to invasive plants, and to facilitate collaborative actions to protect Canada from the impacts of high-priority invasive plants. | The Agency developed a draft framework for invasive plants. | |
| Determine first-priority invasive plant species that threaten Canada and establish appropriate response plans and control measures for their prevention, early detection or management. | The CFIA initiated the “Least Wanted Plants” Project. |
Program Activity - Integrated Regulatory Frameworks
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Work toward implementing the government-wide CDSR which is aimed at improving the GoC’s regulatory processes. As TBS develops frameworks and policies to support the CDSR, the Agency will integrate them into its regulatory development processes |
The CFIA supported the Committee of Federal Regulators and was actively involved in performance measurement task teams and action learning groups. The CFIA completed a Regulatory Guide and posted it on the Agency’s external website for discussion and information purposes. Presentations to staff were organized to increase awareness of changes. |
|
| Contribute to the GoC’s PBRI to measure the administrative burden imposed by government on small business pursue opportunities to reduce, rationalize and simplify regulatory requirements by up to 20% by November 2008. |
The CFIA reduced the number of forms, amended regulations requirements and removed redundant or obsolete requirements to simplify the language. The Agency achieved its target of a 20 per cent reduction in administrative burden imposed on business. This success represents over 250 projects taken from across the Agency’s mandate with a view to streamlining and simplifying administrative requirements. For example, the Agency reduced the number of horse import regulations from 25 to one. |
|
| Contribute to the Growing Forward vision for agricultural policy and program development agreed upon on June 29, 2007, by federal, provincial and territorial Ministers of Agriculture. | The CFIA established a MoU for 2008-09 with AAFC for continuity of food safety related activities under Growing Forward. See table 3.2.6.2 for further information. | |
| Support the NAAHP through the advancement of regulations under the Health of Animals Act to encompass aquatic animals and related reportable and notifiable diseases of trade concern. | Regulatory development is ongoing. | |
| Advance regulations to add a list of toxic substances to the Health of Animals Regulations to allow the CFIA to respond to toxic contamination events in the same manner as it responds to animal disease emergencies. | The initial draft regulation and supporting documents were completed. | |
| Advance regulatory amendments under the Canada Agricultural Products Act with respect to Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Regulations, Licensing and Arbitration Regulations, Dairy Regulations and Maple Regulations in order to ensure fair and equitable trade practices. | Regulatory development is ongoing in this area. | |
| Review alcohol legislation. | Develop legislative and policy options on underlying issues such as certification of age and origin characteristics for exported Canadian whisky. | The CFIA examined legislative and policy options for a comprehensive alcoholic beverage statute. Time-sensitive issues were addressed on an individual basis, one being legislation for ice wine. |
| Further to the Organic Products Regulations, published in December 2006, advance plans for 2008-09 and beyond. | Establish a Canada Organic Office. | The Canada Organic Office was established. |
| Develop a web-based performance management system for industry. | This initiative was placed on hold. | |
| Negotiate equivalency of regulations and standards with other countries. | Support was provided to the Canada Organic Office in negotiation of equivalency arrangements. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue to work on trade barriers with national partners and stakeholders including provincial/ territorial departments. |
The CFIA completed a draft workplan for the Single Window Initiative (SWI), which endeavours to implement a streamlined approach for the electronic collection, use and dissemination of commercial trade data. Russia's Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance
posted the list of 134 Canadian establishments approved to export fish products
to the Russian Federation. |
|
| Continue to lead Canada’s participation in a number of international regulatory fora, including the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement discussions; the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC); and the OIE. |
Continued on-going preparation of positions for Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) codes, the IPPC and the WTO in consultation with national partners and stakeholders. CFIA representatives attended the 2008 OIE Annual General Assembly and the 29th World Veterinary Congress in Vancouver. The Agency participated in consistent bilateral discussions and negotiations with international communities focused on:
|
|
| Continue to work bilaterally and multilaterally with a number of national and international partners to remain at the forefront of scientific developments and to advance sound, science-based decision making. | The CFIA continued ongoing bilateral negotiations to resolve technical barriers based on sound science and international standards (e.g. access to a number of markets was regained for Canadian cattle products). | |
| Continue to work bilaterally and multilaterally with a number of national and international partners to promote the development and implementation of both domestic and international science-based regulation related to the CFIA’s mandate and regulatory responsibilities. |
The CFIA continued to monitor the development of SPS measures and WTO and North American Free Trade Agreement notifications to identify potential issues that may impact export of agricultural products. The Agency also increased awareness of international rights, obligations and standards in the development of domestic policies and regulations. |
Program Activity - Domestic and International Market Access
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue to promote compliance by conducting trader education in regulatory requirements; investigating consumer and trade complaints; inspecting and testing food products at the manufacturing, retail and import levels of trade; and taking effective compliance and enforcement action. |
The CFIA continued to promote compliance for area inspectors through the verification of facts associated with all complaints received from consumers, trade or government agencies. This included receiving the complaint, conducting verifications, preparing reports, follow-up action, providing feedback to complainants (where appropriate) and any referral action required. The CFIA investigated 283 instances of non-compliance to the Canada Agricultural Products Act, the Fish Inspection Act, the Food and Drugs Act, and the Meat Inspection Act. Combined with investigations carried over from previous reporting periods, these investigations resulted in 30 convictions and $138,500 in fines. |
|
| Continue to conduct research and lead initiatives that will enhance the CFIA’s capacity to address product misrepresentation issues. Planned activities for 2008-09 include a review of the labelling policy for the “Product of Canada” claims. |
The CFIA's work to address product misrepresentation issues focussed on "Product of Canada" and "Made in Canada" claims on foods. Public consultations held on the Canadian Food Labelling Initiative resulted in revisions to the guidelines to assist consumers in making purchasing decisions. A discussion paper, the "Canadian Food Labelling Initiative" was published in May 2008. |
|
| Begin the development of a policy framework to clarify the scope of the CFIA’s consumer protection mandate. | Work in this area has been deferred to 2009-10. | |
| Contribute to the GoC review of its current voluntary “Product of Canada” and “Made in Canada” labelling policies. |
New Product of Canada / Made in Canada guidelines came into effect. Implementation included:
|
|
| Continue to promote compliance with consumer protection elements in non-food sectors, such as seed and fertilizers, through label review in order to mitigate against the risk of false or misleading representation of products. Regulatory oversight of product quality and/or efficacy in these areas will also ensure consumer protection. |
The Agency continued to promote compliance with area inspectors by verifying the facts associated with all complaints received from consumers, trade or government agencies. This included receiving the complaint, conducting verifications, preparing reports, follow-up action, providing feedback to complainants (where appropriate) and any referral action required. The CFIA undertakes products assessments and conducts inspections and market place monitoring relating to product quality and/or efficacy as an element of its ongoing core business. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue to promote the acceptance and implementation of Good Importing Practices (GIP) with industry in order to encourage importers of agri-food products to develop and put in place hygiene controls to improve food safety outcomes and enhance compliance with regulations. | The CFIA continued to promote importer licensing and the implementation of GIP. | |
| Continue to work towards an Enhanced Import Control Program to provide equivalency for domestic food-related trade requirements. | Conduct a horizontal review of import control programs. | In reviewing approaches to evaluate current industry practices regarding food safety, the CFIA initiated a horizontal review of import control programs. |
| Enhance import control activities | Efforts focused on identifying business requirements to inform the development of a business model for the enhanced system for the Fresh Fruit and Vegetables Sector. These efforts align with broader IM/IT solutions, including preliminary work towards the development of a licensing/registration strategy and supporting activities. | |
|
Amend policies to provide clear directives to importers in meeting all regulatory requirements. |
The CFIA completed the Fish Import Strengthening initiative and improved transparency regarding the fish import regulatory requirements, the CFIA’s role, importer responsibilities and the product inspection process. Work was undertaken in collaboration with HC to amend the Food and Drugs Act via Bill C-51. The Bill was deferred, pending further analysis/resolution of questions surrounding Natural Health Products. |
|
| Clarify procedures for inspectors in conducting compliance verification activities. |
The Agency focused efforts on improving training material for inspectors and bolstering the knowledge of program and policy developers. The material includes an explanation of the legislative process, the CFIA legislative base and the role of CFIA divisions that intersect throughout the legislative process. Additional efforts included the training of 27 trainers on allergens, who then began training inspectors to enhance inspection capabilities. The Agency also finalized the Food Allergy Reference and Training Manual, which includes information on allergen legislation and food safety control system assessment procedures. |
|
| Together with the CBSA, continue to work towards the SWI, which endeavours to implement a streamlined approach for the electronic collection, use and dissemination of commercial trade data. The SWI will provide a single interface that will allow traders to fulfil all import, export and transit-related regulatory requirements more efficiently, thereby reducing the paper burden and potential duplication posed by the current system. | A draft workplan for the SWI has been completed. | |
| Contribute to the development of E-certification (e-cert) and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) for meat and plant products in order to reduce paper burden on industry and wait times at the border. |
The CFIA continued to develop e-cert systems to better facilitate and monitor trade of meat, plant and animal health products. Two national workshops were held to examine and refine the requirements necessary to build the plant and animal health e-cert systems. A trial exercise of the "Read Importing Country Requirements module" of the meat e-cert system was conducted in registered establishments. Key benefits of the systems when fully deployed include increased efficiencies in the certification process, reduced paper burden for industry and government and reduced potential for fraudulent documentation. With the implementation of mandatory EDI through the CBSA in 2006-07, the CFIA continued to streamline import requirements to accommodate the electronic submission of supporting import documentation and certificates. |
|
| Develop and implement a dedicated Destination Inspection Service (DIS) for fresh fruits and vegetables, the objective of which is to deliver timely, non-biased quality inspections for fresh fruits and vegetables to be used for dispute resolution purposes. | Develop a national training program to enable consistency in program delivery. | The CFIA continued to enhance DIS inspector training and reference material, delivered numerous training sessions across Canada to inspectors of various levels of expertise and conducted various DIS consistency verifications resulting in enhancements to the DIS program design. |
| Implement an integrated and comprehensive information system. |
The implementation of an integrated and comprehensive information system has been deferred for 2008-09. Work continued to enhance current corporate applications, such as the Multi-Commodity Activities Program, to better reflect stakeholder and inspector needs. The CFIA began exploring the applicability of the new Conformity Verification System to the DIS model. |
| 2008-09 RPP Commitment | Sub-Commitment | Results Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Continue to promote the safety of imported products that enter Canada by working with partners, such as the CBSA, to close potential gaps in security that may threaten the food supply, crops and livestock from invasive organisms. |
The CFIA continued to work with national and international partners to enhance information exchange mechanisms to improve the safety of imported products. Through the FCSAP, the Agency is focusing its efforts on enhancing regulatory compliance related to the safety of domestic and imported food. In addition, the Agency has initiated the PHCTSP, which specifically targets the Agency’s information requirements pertaining to imports. |
|
| Under the umbrella of the SPP, the CFIA will continue to work with partners to develop mechanisms to enhance cooperation and information exchange on food safety within North America. | The CFIA continued to promote the safety of imported products by working with national and international partners to enhance information exchange mechanisms and conducting further research on food safety issues including outbreaks involving bio-threat agents. |
| Management Priorities | Results Achieved |
|---|---|
| Implementing Human Resources Renewal. |
|
|
Enhancing alignment and coordination within the Agency to better integrate risk management into effective policy development, program design and delivery. Note: Further information on progress made against RPP commitments under this priority is outlined in section 1.4.3 of this report. |
A) Integrated Risk Management The CFIA-initiated activities included:
B) Effective Information and Knowledge Management
C) Modernization of the PAA and MRRS
|
| Management Initiatives | Results Achieved |
|---|---|
|
Quality Management in Operations—Consistency Initiative A key component of the Agency’s efforts to improve the consistency of operational delivery of its services across Canada is the implementation of a quality management system which applies to three broad areas of activity:
|
|
|
Compliance and Enforcement Policy The CFIA’s plans included:
|
|
|
Corporate Communication Strategy Implement a proactive Corporate Communications Strategy (CCS) |
|
|
2007-08 CFIA Strategic review |
Results included:
|
|
Procurement and Contract Management
|
|
|
Integrated Asset Management Framework
|
|
|
Environmental Management Program
Specific targets:
|
|
|
Strategic Plan for Sustainable Development The CFIA will: Complete a Strategic Plan for Sustainable Development, including: Identification of pilot projects (sustainable initiatives); and Carry out education and awareness activities. |
|
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| Extent to which inspected federally-registered establishments comply with federal food safety requirements | ≥ 98% compliance | - | - | - | 3 of 5 targets met |
| Meat | ≥ 98% compliance | 87% | 99% | 99% | 95% |
| Fish and Seafood | ≥ 98% compliance | 99% | 99% | 99% | 99% |
| Processed products | ≥ 98% compliance | 97% | 96% | 99% | 96% |
| Dairy | ≥ 98% compliance | 86% | 97% | 100% | 100% |
| Shell egg | ≥ 98% compliance | 98% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
| Extent to which domestic and imported food products comply with federal chemical residue requirements | ≥ 95% compliance | - | - | - | 6 of 7 targets met |
| Meat | ≥ 95% compliance | 96% | 97% | 96% | 97% |
| Fish and Seafood | ≥ 95% compliance | 98% | 96% | 95% | 96% |
| Fresh fruit and vegetables | ≥ 95% compliance | 99% | 97% | 95% | 97% |
| Processed products | ≥ 95% compliance | 99% | 100% | 99% | 99% |
| Honey | ≥ 95% compliance | 94% | 92% | 84% | 76% |
| Shell egg | ≥ 95% compliance | 93% | 87% | 97% | 97% |
| Dairy | ≥ 95% compliance | 99% | 99% | 97% | 98% |
| Time taken to issue public warnings for Class I recalls | 100% of Class I recalls are issued within 24 hours of a recall decision | - | - | - | Met |
| Time taken to issue public warnings for Class I recalls | 100% of Class I recalls are issued within 24 hours of a recall decision | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99.55% |
| Extent to which nutrition information on food products inspected is accurate | ≥ 80% of food products inspected declare nutrition information which is accurate | - | - | - | Met |
| Extent to which nutrition information on food products inspected is accurate | ≥ 80% of food products inspected declare nutrition information which is accurate | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | 85% |
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| Number of incidents of Avian Influenza that expand beyond the initial control zone | No expansion of the disease beyond the initial control zone | - | - | - | Met |
| Number of incidents of Avian Influenza that expand beyond the initial control zone | No expansion of the disease beyond the initial control zone | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | No expansion of the disease beyond the initial control zone |
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| Extent to which the CFIA’s data indicates that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered Canada via specified regulated pathways | No evidence (i.e. confirmed by the CFIA’s data) that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered into Canada through specified regulated pathways | - | - | - | Met |
| Extent to which the CFIA’s data indicates that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered Canada via specified regulated pathways | No evidence (i.e. confirmed by the CFIA’s data) that foreign regulated animal diseases have entered into Canada through specified regulated pathways | None | None | None | No indication that foreign regulated diseases have entered into Canada through specified regulated pathways |
| Extent to which the CFIA’s data indicates the spread of foreign regulated animal diseases which entered into Canada this fiscal year | No evidence of spread of foreign regulated animal diseases beyond the initial control zone | - | - | - | Met |
| Extent to which the CFIA’s data indicates the spread of foreign regulated animal diseases which entered into Canada this fiscal year | No evidence of spread of foreign regulated animal diseases beyond the initial control zone | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | No evidence of spread of foreign regulated animal diseases beyond the initial control zone |
| Extent to which renderers and feed mills inspected are without any major deviations with respect to the Feeds Regulations and the Health of Animals Regulations (Enhanced Feed Ban) | ≥ 95% compliance | - | - | - | Not met |
| Renderers | ≥ 95% compliance | N/A | 100% | 95% | 93% |
| Feed Mills | ≥ 95% compliance | N/A | 82% | 75% | 78% |
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| Extent to which CFIA data indicates the entry and establishment of new and foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into Canada (listed diseases/pests in the Regulated Pest List for Canada) | No evidence (i.e. confirmed CFIA data) of the entry and establishment of new foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into Canada through specified regulated pathways | - | - | - | Met |
| Extent to which CFIA data indicates the entry and establishment of new and foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into Canada (listed diseases/pests in the Regulated Pest List for Canada) | No evidence (i.e. confirmed CFIA data) of the entry and establishment of new foreign regulated plant diseases and pests into Canada through specified regulated pathways | 4 entries | 2 entries | 2 entries | No Evidence of entry and establishment of new or foreign plant diseases and pests |
| Extent of change in the presence of regulated plant diseases or pests beyond the regulated areas | No evidence of increase in the size of regulated areas for plant diseases / pests attributable to human activity | - | - | - | Not Met |
| Extent of change in the presence of regulated plant diseases or pests beyond the regulated areas | No evidence of increase in the size of regulated areas for plant diseases / pests attributable to human activity | Some increase | Some increase | Increase | 5 pests spread outside regulated areas |
| Extent to which Plant Health risks identified by the CFIA (within and outside Canada) are communicated to the affected stakeholders | Following the identification of a plant health risk, appropriate information is communicated with the relevant stakeholders in less than one month | - | - | - | Not Met |
| Extent to which Plant Health risks identified by the CFIA (within and outside Canada) are communicated to the affected stakeholders | Following the identification of a plant health risk, appropriate information is communicated with the relevant stakeholders in less than one month | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | 33% of the items took more than one month |
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| Extent to which authorized novel products, having undergone an environmental assessment, comply with CFIA requirements and standards outlined in the authorization | No target was set for this performance indicator for 2008-09. However, for 2 of 4 sub-indicators, targets from 2007-08 have been carried forward | - | - | - | 1 of 2 targets met |
| Plants with Novel Traits | 90% | 94% | 94% | 96% | 96% |
| Novel Fertilizer | 95% | 92% | 96% | 95% | 80% |
| Feed | N/A | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A |
| Veterinary Biologics | N/A | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A |
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| The proportion of regulatory initiatives that are pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I prior to publication in Canada Gazette, Part II | ≥ 95% of regulatory initiatives are pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I prior to publication in Canada Gazette, Part II | - | - | - | Met |
| The proportion of regulatory initiatives that are pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I prior to publication in Canada Gazette, Part II | ≥ 95% of regulatory initiatives are pre-published in Canada Gazette, Part I prior to publication in Canada Gazette, Part II | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | 100% (There were four approved and acceptable exceptions) |
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Performance Status for | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | ||
| Extent to which products, labels, and advertisements inspected are accurately represented | 70% of products, labels, and advertisements inspected are accurately represented | - | - | - | Met |
| Extent to which products, labels, and advertisements inspected are accurately represented | 70% of products, labels, and advertisements inspected are accurately represented | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | 82% |
| Extent to which certified food, animal and plant shipments meet the receiving country's import requirements | ≥ 99% meet requirements | - | - | - | 4 of 5 targets met |
| Food - Meat | ≥ 99% meet requirements | 99% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
| Food - Fish and seafood | ≥ 99% meet requirements | 99% | 99% | 99% | 99% |
| Food - Processed Egg | ≥ 99% meet requirements | 99% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
| Animal | ≥ 99% meet requirements | - | - | - | No data available |
| Animal | ≥ 99% meet requirements | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | N/A – This is a new indicator for 2008-09 | - |
| Plant | ≥ 99% meet requirements | 99.90% | 99.90% | 99.90% | 100% |
| Associated SO(s) | Operational Priorities | Performance Indicators | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO 1 | Enhancing regulatory compliance, with a focus on safety of domestic and imported food |
|
|||
| SO 1 and SO 2 | Strengthening preparedness to mitigate and respond to animal and plant diseases and pests |
|
|||
| SO 3 | Improving the program and regulatory framework to support continued consumer protection and economic prosperity |
|
|||
As a regulatory agency, the principal means by which the CFIA carries out its mandate is by measuring rates of compliance with Canadian food, animal, and plant legislative requirements. The CFIA promotes compliance by conducting inspections, audits, product sampling and verifications. The CFIA also carries out education and awareness activities to increase regulated parties’ understanding of statutory requirements and standards. Compliance rates are an indicator of the extent to which regulated parties have adhered to federal acts and regulations. The CFIA takes the following approaches to assessing compliance. These include:
The methods for determining compliance reflect the level and type of risks associated with the food or agricultural products being assessed. The specific methods the CFIA uses to determine compliance are below:
Varying by program, non-compliance can be determined if:
Where compliance rates appear in this report, the relevant method used to assess compliance has been noted.
When CFIA inspectors determine that a regulated party is non-compliant, that party is required to take corrective action. If non-compliance persists, Agency inspectors have a variety of tools at their disposal. In a graduated approach, these tools range from procedural actions including letters of non-compliance, seizure and detention, suspension/cancellation of licences/registrations/permits and recommending prosecution.
The complexity of the agri-food sector and the inherent variability of the biological and production systems underpinning it are such that some degree of non-compliance is inevitable. A compliance rate of less than 100% means that some proportion of the facilities or products inspected by the CFIA has failed to meet certain requirements or standards as defined by the legislation. Major variances have the potential to pose a significant risk to human, animal or plant health and/or other program objectives. These are always met with vigorous enforcement actions to assure protection of Canadians and the plant and animal resource base. Some deficiencies represent “minor” variances and do not pose a significant risk to human, animal or plant health.
It is critical to note that the nature of the CFIA's mandated responsibilities is dynamic, given their basis in biological and production systems that are ever-changing. The inherent variability of these systems makes them difficult to predict and it is reasonable to expect some shift in compliance from year to year. The specificity of targets and reported results must be considered in this context.