This policy outlines the procedures for integrating audits of the Food Safety Enhancement Program (FSEP) and the Quality Management Program (QMP). It is intended to be applied in establishments which are federally registered under the Fish Inspection Regulations and the authority of another Act or Regulation administered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).
"HACCP": means Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point - a systematic approach to the identification and assessment of the hazards and risks associated with a food operation and to the identification of the means for their control.
"FSEP": means the Food Safety Enhancement Program - described as a CFIA approach to encourage the development, implementation and maintenance of HACCP systems in all federally registered establishments excluding federally registered fish establishments.
"QMP": means the Quality Management Program - a fish inspection and control system which includes procedures, inspections and records, for the purpose of verifying and documenting the processing of fish and the safety and quality of fish processed in Canada for export.
"Minor non-conformity": An isolated non-conformity within the sub-element of the prerequisite program, Regulatory Action Point, a CCP of the HACCP plan or other regulatory requirements being audited.
"Major non-conformity": A non-conformity that compromises the integrity of the HACCP system or may result in a fraudulent product.
The intent of this policy is to provide the scope and procedures for conducting audits in multi-commodity establishments which are operating under the FSEP and the QMP. This policy seeks to be consistent with the existing audit criteria that are being applied to establishments operating with FSEP or QMP systems.
During the early 1990's, HACCP systems were developed by two federal departments: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada developed the Food Safety Enhancement Program (FSEP) and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans developed the Quality Management Program (QMP)
The creation of the CFIA merged the departments; however the two HACCP systems remain. FSEP continues to be utilised in the recognition and auditing of HACCP systems for agricultural commodities, and the Fish Inspection Program continues to implement the QMP. This resulted in two separate system evaluations being conducted by CFIA staff in an establishment registered under the Fish Inspection Regulations with a QMP, that also had FSEP for other products such as meat, dairy or processed fruits and vegetables.
FSEP and QMP share similar requirements for prerequisite programs and HACCP plans. The requirements of the FSEP prerequisite program meet the requirements of the QMP prerequisite program. Both programs require the implementation of regulatory action points (RAP) (note that RAPs are dependent on program requirements as described in their respective manuals). Also, both programs use the 7 principles of HACCP.
The policy will serve to satisfy five purposes:
The goal of this policy is to provide procedures for auditing the FSEP and the QMP simultaneously, while maintaining the requirements for both programs. The audit policy will provide the establishment with a consistent and uniform approach toward auditing, reporting of results, and expectations of corrective actions.
This policy will be applied to the following scenarios:
Establishments must comply with the most stringent record-keeping requirements as outlined in FSEP and QMP (i.e., records must be kept for all monitoring activities in prerequisite programs as required by the FSEP). For RAPs within the QMP, records by exception are permitted (i.e., when a deficiency is identified, the establishment is required to record the deficiency and the corrective action taken).
The existing FSEP and QMP policies and procedures are to be applied during the audit. Audit criteria and documentation that are similar in nature have been combined. Requirements that are specific to each program have been added to the scope of the audit. Every effort should be made to share results between programs and to avoid duplication of tasks (i.e., plant profile completed by responsible inspector should be shared with QMP auditors).
1. When an FSEP recognition is conducted in conjunction with a QMP Compliance Verification (CV), the following forms (see Appendices) are to be used:
2. When an FSEP partial audit is conducted in conjunction with a QMP CV the following forms (see Appendices) are to be used:
3. When an FSEP verification is conducted in conjunction with a QMP CV, the following forms (see Appendices) are to be used:
The auditor(s) must have the appropriate FSEP and/or QMP training and be designated under the relevant regulations. The audit team should hold a pre-audit meeting to plan the audit (e.g., scope of the audit, checklist, time frames etc.). This could be done in person, by telephone or through e-mail.
The scope for each audit will be comprised of the following items to ensure that all required elements are covered as per QMP and FSEP requirements:
The audit scope will also include those FSEP and QMP tasks that are not audited on every visit but must be completed within a series of audits (i.e., Regulatory Action Points, HACCP plan review tasks, Background Product and Process information, Verification/Validation, and Record Keeping requirements).
Auditing techniques and methodology will be implemented using the existing FSEP and QMP requirements (based on ISO standards). The FSEP/QMP Audit Scope Worksheet will be utilized to record the scope of the audit as described in the policies and procedures of the Facilities Inspection Manual and the FSEP Manual.
For the purpose of this policy, non-conformities will be identified to the establishment as either minor or major as per the FSEP Manual. Generally, the critical non-conformity from the QMP will be equivalent to a major non-conformity, and a non-conformity from the QMP will be equivalent to a minor non-conformity from the FSEP.
To provide clarification on classifying non-conformities, fraud related non-conformities within the authority of the Fish Inspection Regulations will be rated as major but will not have an affect on the Partial Audit Flow Diagram outlined in the FSEP Manual. Repetitive non-conformities related to the Fish Inspection Regulations may result in enforcement action as described in Chapter 3, Subject 3 of the Facilities Inspection Manual and the Compliance Management Process.
Deficiencies identified in an establishment's written program may result in a non-conformity (QMP) or an incomplete (FSEP). In either case, the establishment would be responsible for amending their written program.
Non-conformities identified in one program must be shared with the auditor from the other program due to possible implications they may have on the other program. This includes non-conformities identified during FSEP Verification when the QMP auditor may not be present.
Establishments may appeal audit results to the Regional Director within 30 days of the decision that is being appealed.
For the purposes of tracking in CFIA information systems (i.e., Multi-commodity Activity Program (MCAP)), FSEP/QMP joint audits will be considered as two separate and distinct audits that will be captured in MCAP Audit for both the FSEP and QMP, when available.
When a non-conformity is identified, the CAR will reference the affected program (QMP, FSEP or both programs). Those non conformities identified with QMP or both programs will be recorded in the MCAP - Fish Component as either a non-conformity or a critical non-conformity as defined by the Facilities Inspection Manual.
In multi-commodity establishments, FSEP audits will be conducted at a frequency outlined in the FSEP Manual and QMP audits will be conducted as outlined in the Facilities Inspection Manual. The FSEP/QMP Audit for Multi-Commodity Establishments Policy will be implemented when a compliance verification coincides with an FSEP partial audit.
The coordination of audits will be the responsibility of Area/Regional Operations and should consider the schedule of the plant, products being processed and the availability of CFIA personnel.
FSEP verification will be applied as per the FSEP Verification Policy. Based on trade requirements for meat, the responsible inspector is required to be present in the establishment for two to three days per week. The audit scope, as outlined in the FSEP Manual, will be delivered over the course of a month instead of a consecutive two to three day period as per the Regulatory System Partial Audit procedures.
FSEP Verification presents a new challenge for the scheduling process in that QMP Compliance Verifications have been traditionally conducted over a 2-3 day period. It will be the responsibility of the FSEP contact person to communicate to the QMP Auditor in each of the Areas as each multi-commodity registered establishment initiates FSEP Verification. Communication between the FSEP and QMP Auditors is essential.
The seven elements of the QMP must be evaluated during a two or three year planning cycle through a series of audits. The scope of these audits may vary from one task to many tasks. Due to this flexibility in delivery, CVs can easily be coordinated with FSEP Verification audits by conducting many CVs, focusing on specific sections or elements of the Reference Standard.
The QMP Auditor and the FSEP Auditor will determine the audit scope. This will allow the QMP Auditor to decide if they will participate in any of the visits that are planned for the month, based on scheduling, production of fish products, and audit tasks that need to be covered in the QMP CV.
Next page: Chapter 3 Subject 6 | Previous page: Chapter 3 Subject 4 - Appendix G