The most common kinds of misleading claims in restaurants can be grouped into the following major categories:
Many deceptive words used in connection with foods are meant to indicate their place of origin and are acceptable as long as they are truthful. For example:
Often, however, the words describing the food are not meant to tell us where a food actually came from. For example:
In cases like these, nobody expects the food to be imported. If such items as French or Italian dressing are named on a menu, customers will understand that the name only describes a type of food.
Sometimes, however, consumers may not be sure whether an adjective used is meant to indicate origin, the type of food, or something else, like a method of cooking. If you think this might happen, it is best to clarify.
When foods are advertised, customers must be informed when a cheaper product has been substituted either in whole or in part for a more expensive one. The following are some common examples of this kind of deception:
| Food being represented | Food actually served |
|---|---|
| orange juice | orange drink from flavor crystals |
| crab salad | crab salad containing kamaboko |
| veal | pork |
| maple syrup | table syrup |
| butter | margarine |
| ice cream | ice milk |
| whipped cream | non-dairy topping |
| coffee | coffee with chicory |
The net quantity of a food served must not be less than the net quantity advertised. Serving less than the amount advertised constitutes deception. For cooked meats, however, the net quantity declared is normally understood to be the net quantity before cooking.
Individuals may not always agree exactly about the meaning of words indicating quantity, such as "large", "medium", and "small", but most people have a general expectation of how much product these words should represent. For example, if it is common practice in most eating establishments to designate a 10 fluid ounce (284 ml) soft drink as "regular", calling this size "large" on the menu may be considered to be misleading, and therefore a violation of the regulations.
Pictures used to advertise foods must also not mislead the customer as to the actual amount of food being offered. For example, a picture of two eggs with three strips of bacon is misleading if the item is served with fewer eggs or bacon strips than shown.
Restaurants naturally want to stress the quality of the meals they serve. This is, of course, acceptable provided that all statements made are truthful.
Here are a few examples of common claims of quality and some precautions you should take to avoid misleading consumers:
"Fresh vegetables" - Canned or frozen vegetables cannot be advertised as fresh.
"We serve only the best", "finest",etc. - If any food so advertised is less than the highest quality available, this claim becomes misleading. For example, serving beef of Canada B grade quality rather than Canada A grade.
"Made fresh every day" - This claim suggests to the customer that the food being served is freshly made daily. If a prepared product is carried over from one day to the next, a claim of this kind would be misleading.
How food is prepared has a great deal to do with how a completed meal looks and tastes. It is also one of the most important factors that customers consider in deciding what to order. Because of this, Restauranteurs should not claim that certain preparation methods have been used if in fact they have not. Pay particular attention to the following claims:
"Homemade" - Any menu item described as "homemade" suggests that the food is not a commercially prepared product. The term is therefore normally inappropriate for use on restaurant menus. Products prepared from scratch on the premises, however, may be described as "homemade style" or "home style" foods.
"Barbecued meats" - Consumers expect these foods to have been cooked by a direct source of radiant heat and not in a pan or an oven. When meats are cooked by frying, broiling,etc.and simply flavored with barbecue sauce, the kind of meat should be named and a descriptive term added like "barbecue flavored" or "with barbecue sauce", (e.g."barbecue flavored pork chops").
Using pictures of food prepared by one method (e.g. charbroiled steak) but serving that item prepared in a different way (e.g. fried steak) is also deceptive.
Advertising often contains claims about what effects certain foods might have on an individual. The Food and Drug Regulations are very specific as to exactly what kinds of claims are allowed.
Nutrition - Regulations limit the kinds of statements that may be made about the nutritional value of foods. Checking with one of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency offices can help you avoid serious violations.
Diet - Before claiming that certain menu items are appropriate for dieters, it is best to check with one of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency offices listed below. These claims are subject to the Food and Drug Regulations. General statements describing items as "light tasting" or "less filling" are usually acceptable.
Remember these key points when you advertise food and when you prepare restaurant or food service menus: