The following sampling plan must be implemented by operators who produce ready-to-eat (RTE) meat and poultry products that are exposed to the environment after processing.
The implementation date for this sampling plan was April 1, 2009.
Establishments producing RTE meat and poultry products are classified according to the risk category of products produced (1, 2A or 2B) and the Relative Risk Level (RRL) under which these products are produced (Annex H, section 3.3). The RRL of L. monocytogenes is determined according to the following factors, as applicable:
The testing frequency increases as the level of associated food safety risk increases. The testing frequency of an establishment is based on the risk category of RTE products (1, 2A or 2B) and the RRL under which these products are produced (Very low to High). For an establishment producing more than one category of RTE products under different RRLs, the establishment's sampling frequency will default to the RRL under which the highest risk category product(s) is produced. The following product sampling frequencies should be followed:
| Risk Category of RTE product(s) | Antimicrobial agent* | Post-lethality treatment: None |
Post-lethality treatment: Yes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | None | 12 samples per year | 9 samples per year |
| Category 1 | Yes | 9 samples per year | 6 samples per year |
| Category 2A | None | 6 samples per year | 4 samples per year |
| Category 2A | Yes | 4 samples per year | 3 samples per year |
| Category 2B | NA | 3 samples per year | 1 sample per year |
*Antimicrobial agent allows no more than 2 log CFU/g increase in L. monocytogenes throughout the stated shelf-life of the product; NA: Not applicable
The operator is responsible for the sample collection process that includes the following steps:
4.1. Training of the designated employee(s) who will work with the sampling plan in order to meet the sampling plan's objectives and specifications.
4.2. Collecting samples in the post-processing RTE area of the establishment according to Appendix B. This must be done under direct CFIA supervision.
4.3. Operators shall prepare and have a written sampling program for risk-based testing of RTE products that covers sample collection, preparation and shipping procedures. It shall also cover means to ensure tamper-evidence, to protect the integrity of samples and to maintain the chain of custody (e.g., how samples are handled, packaged and shipped).
Samples must be appropriately sealed under CFIA supervision (tamper evident).
The shipping procedures shall specify:
The general guideline for the sample collection, shipping and integrity protection is provided in Appendix B.
4.4 The VIC/IIC (Veterinarian/Inspector-in-Charge) will review and approve the establishment's written program. The VIC/IIC will verify the sampling activities and will complete the appropriate inspection tasks as per the Compliance Verification System (CVS).
It is recommended to hold the sampled "lot" pending laboratory result.
The samples will be analysed for L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. If the product is an uncooked dry or semi-dry fermented sausage and contains beef, it will also be analysed for E. coli O157:H7.
For each sample, five 25 g test portions/samples for a total of 125 g sample size for Category 1 product, and five 10 g test portions/samples for a total of 50 g sample size for Category 2 product, as defined by Health Canada's "Policy on L. monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat Foods" (2010), will be analysed for L. monocytogenes; and five 65 g test portions/samples for a total of 325 g sample size will be analysed for Salmonella spp. The analysis for E. coli O157:H7, when required, will be conducted on five 65 g test portions/samples for a total of 325 g sample size.
The following analytical methods are to be used:
The Compendium methods MFHPB-30 and MFLP-28. Alternate methods*: the FSIS MLG 8.07 and 8A.04.
The Compendium methods MFHPB-20 and MFLP-29. Alternate methods*: the FSIS MLG 4.05 and 4C.03.
The Compendium methods MFLP-80 and MFLP-30. Alternate methods*: the FSIS MLG 5.05 and 5A.02.
*Note: Alternate methods will be considered exclusively for products to be exported to the USA.
The samples must be analysed in a laboratory accredited by the Standards Council of Canada (SCC) and the required methods must be included in the laboratory scope of accreditation. The operator must therefore ensure that the methods used, which are not yet in the scope of accreditation, are included in the scope for the next SCC audit.
Approved methods can be found in the Health Canada Compendium of Analytical Methods at the following site, but the "application" section must be appropriate for the intended purpose.
National Micro Sampling Plans
Floor 4, Room 250
1400 Merivale Road, Tower 2
Ottawa, (ON), K1A 0Y9
or fax: (613) 773-5957
or email: RTE-PAM@inspection.gc.ca
Please note that if, for whatever reason, the laboratory is unable to analyse and make an evaluation of the sample submitted for analysis, a replacement sample must be sent as soon as possible.
When pathogens are detected in a sample, the sampled lot is considered contaminated (adulterated) and following measures must be taken:
8.1. The contaminated lot must remain under the operator's control.
8.2. The IIC will issue a Corrective Action Request (CAR) that requires the operator to submit an action plan to the IIC within five working days of the notification of an unsatisfactory test result. The action plan must meet all requirements of an acceptable action plan as stated in Chapter 18 of the Meat Hygiene Manual of Procedures. The action plan must clearly state which subsequent production lots will be tested for the pathogen to verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions and preventative measures.
Please refer to the Meat Hygiene Manual of Procedures (MOP Chapter 18) for additional information on specific follow-ups.
8.3. The CFIA notification procedures must be clearly outlined in the written sampling program (e.g., who in the company will notify the VIC/IIC when the analysis is completed and the result is unsatisfactory, e.g., Listeria monocytogenes was detected in a sample).
8.4. In the unlikely event that the sampled lot was distributed before the positive result was received or if it is determined that there are other products in distribution that are implicated by the positive result, the CFIA will immediately notify the OFSR (Office of Food Safety and Recall). If any of the involved product was exported, the regulatory authority of concerned countries would also be immediately notified (e.g.: FSIS {Food Safety and Inspection Service} would be informed and provided with the distribution details if the products had been exported to the USA).
8.5. For RTE meat and poultry products, zero tolerance applies for tested pathogens, including Listeria monocytogenes, in products that support its growth (Category 1). Importing countries may have different requirements; refer to MOP Chapter 11 for country specific requirements.
All laboratory reports should be kept for at least one year after the end of the sampled product's shelf life.
Other records should be kept as per the operator's HACCP plan.
The following list must be used when two or more products are produced on the day of testing.
The highest risk post-lethality exposed RTE product produced at the time of collection must be sampled. The products are listed in decreasing order of risk (sliced deli meats being the highest risk):
Note: All these products will be considered as Category 1 products if they don't meet the physico-chemical and other relevant processing parameters of Categories 2A or 2B products as per section 3.0 of Annex H. Any deviation in the key processing parameter must be corrected and verified to confirm compliance and classification of product(s) into Category 2A or 2B.
The following general guidelines should be followed for sample collection and shipping procedure, and for the maintenance of the integrity of samples: