Furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran in Selected Foods – April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019
Food chemistry – Targeted surveys – Final report
PDF (660 kb)
Targeted surveys provide information on potential food hazards and enhance the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA's) routine monitoring programs. These surveys provide evidence regarding the safety of the food supply, identify potential emerging hazards, and contribute new information and data to food categories where it may be limited or non-existent. They are often used by the Agency to focus surveillance on potential areas of higher risk. Surveys can also help to identify trends and provide information about how industry complies with Canadian regulations.
Furan is a chemical that can unintentionally form in foods that undergo thermal treatment such as canningReference 1. Precursors to furan that are often present in food include ascorbic acid, polyunsaturated fatty acids, amino acids and sugarsReference 1 Reference 2 Reference 3. This compound occasionally coexists with 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran. In this report, the term 'furans' refers to the sum of furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran, whereas 'furan' refers only to the furan compound. The term "analogue" refers to compounds which have similar but slightly different structures; it is sometimes used in this report to refer to the 3 forms of furan. It should be noted that the furans in this survey are not related to chlorinated dibenzofurans, the environmental contaminants which are often also referred to as "furans".
Furan may pose a health risk to the consumer, as the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified it as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans'Reference 4. Additionally, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran have been shown to have a similar toxicity to furanReference 5. Although preliminary estimates for consumer exposure are well below what would cause harmful effects, limited information is available concerning furan levels in food. Therefore, the goal of this survey was to generate further baseline surveillance data on the presence and levels of furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran in selected heat treated foods available on the Canadian retail market.
A total of 250 samples were collected from retail stores in 6 cities across Canada. The samples collected included canned fish, canned meat, canned milk, dried dairy products, dried beverage mix and soy sauce. Furans were detected in 70% of the survey samples and levels ranged from 1.23 ppb (parts per billion) to 179 ppb. The highest average concentrations of furans were found in soy sauce. None of the dried dairy products had detected levels of furans. In 52% of the samples, only 1 of the 3 furans was present. It was also common for products to contain both furan and 2-methylfuran. The results from this survey were comparable to those found in international surveys and a variety of scientific studies.
The levels of furans observed in this survey were evaluated by Health Canada (HC) who determined that none of the samples would pose an unacceptable human health concern, therefore there were no recalls resulting from this survey.
What are targeted surveys
Targeted surveys are used by the CFIA to focus its surveillance activities on areas of highest health risk. The information gained from these surveys provides support for the allocation and prioritization of the agency's activities to areas of greater concern. Originally started as a project under the Food Safety Action Plan (FSAP), targeted surveys have been embedded in our regular surveillance activities since 2013. Targeted surveys are a valuable tool for generating information on certain hazards in foods, identifying and characterizing new and emerging hazards, informing trend analysis, prompting and refining health risk assessments, highlighting potential contamination issues, as well as assessing and promoting compliance with Canadian regulations.
Food safety is a shared responsibility. We work with federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments and provide regulatory oversight of the food industry to promote safe handling of foods throughout the food production chain. The food industry and retail sectors in Canada are responsible for the food they produce and sell, while individual consumers are responsible for the safe handling of the food they have in their possession.
Why did we conduct this survey
The main objectives of this targeted survey were to generate further baseline surveillance data on the level of furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran in domestic and imported products on the Canadian retail market, and to compare the prevalence of furans in foods targeted in this survey with that of similar products in international surveys and to the scientific literature.
Furan may pose a health risk to consumers since the IARC has classified it as 'possibly carcinogenic to humans'Reference 4. Furan can sometimes form in foods that undergo heat treatments, particularly in foods that contain its precursors such as ascorbic acid, polyunsaturated fatty acids, amino acids and sugarsReference 1 Reference 2 Reference 3. In some foods, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran can also form, which have a similar toxicity to furanReference 5. Because thermal treatments are widely used for manufacturing shelf-stable food, it is important to establish data on the prevalence of furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran in food available on the Canadian retail market.
Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for furans levels have not yet been established, as the toxicity of furans in humans is not well known. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) have studied furan levels in a variety of commoditiesReference 6 Reference 7, but limited data is available concerning 2- and 3-methylfuran levels. This survey was initiated in consultation with HC to establish further baseline surveillance data to compliment and expand upon the data collected by other agenciesReference 1.
What did we sample
A variety of domestic and imported canned fish, canned meats, canned milks, dried beverage mixes, dried dairy products and soy sauces were sampled between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Samples of products were collected from local/regional retail locations located in 6 major cities across Canada. These cities encompassed 4 Canadian geographical areas: Atlantic (Halifax), Quebec (Montreal), Ontario (Toronto, Ottawa) and the West (Vancouver, and Calgary). The number of samples collected from these cities was in proportion to the relative population of the respective areas. The shelf life, storage conditions, and the cost of the food on the open market were not considered in this survey.
|Product type||Number of domestic samples||Number of imported samples||Number of samples of unspecifiedTable Note a origin||Total number of samples|
|Dried beverage mix||10||7||25||42|
|Dried dairy products||20||5||17||42|
- Table Note a
Unspecified refers to those samples for which the country of origin could not be assigned from the product label or available sample information
How were samples analyzed and assessed
Samples were analyzed by an ISO 17025 accredited CFIA food testing laboratory. The results presented represent finished food products as sold and not as they would be consumed, whether the product sampled is considered an ingredient or requires preparation prior to consumption.
In the absence of established tolerances or standards for furans in foods, elevated levels of in specific foods may be assessed by HC on a case-by-case basis using the most current scientific data available.
What were the survey results
Of the 250 samples tested, 176 (70%) had detected levels of furans. Table 1 shows that the detection rate of furans varied greatly between product types. Among all product types included in this survey, the average concentration was highest in soy sauce and lowest in dried dairy products. Average concentrations of the analogues were comparable, with furan having the highest average concentration and 3-methylfuran having the lowest. In 38% of products included in this survey, furan and 2-methylfuran were both detected, and more than half of the samples contained only a single furan analogue.
|Product type||Number of samples||Number of samples (%) with detected levels||Minimum (ppb)||Maximum (ppb)||AverageTable Note b (ppb)|
|Canned fish||50||50 (100)||16.3||146||46.6|
|Canned meat||50||50 (100)||10.8||64||31.1|
|Canned milk||16||10 (63)||13.9||33.2||19.8|
|Dried beverage mix||42||15 (36)||5.1||22.5||9.7|
|Dried dairy products||42||0 (0)||0||0||0|
|Soy sauce||50||50 (100)||1.2||179||73.8|
|Grand total||250||176 (70)||1.2||179||45.5|
- Table Note b
Only positive results were used to calculate the average levels
All canned fish samples had detected levels of furans. As the chart in Figure 1 shows, most canned fish samples contained between 16 ppb and 84 ppb furans, with a few samples containing above 110 ppb.
All canned meat samples had detected levels of furans. Of the 12 samples included in this survey that contained all 3 furan analogues, 11 were canned meat samples.
A majority (63%) of canned milk samples had detected levels of furans. In canned milk products, the average 2-methylfuran level was nearly twice that of furan, whereas for all other product types, average furan and 2-methylfuran levels were comparable.
A majority (64%) of sampled dried beverage mixes did not have detected levels of furans and dried beverages contained the lowest positive concentration of all product types included in this survey. Dried beverages included tea-based drink mixes as well as hot and cold chocolate-based drink mixes.
Dried dairy products
None of the 42 dried dairy products sampled in this survey contained detected levels of furans. This category included skim milk powder and coffee whitener.
All of the 50 soy sauces sampled contained detected levels of furans. The average concentration of furans in soy sauces was higher than that of other product types included in this survey.
Figure 1 shows that the levels of furans varied considerably between individual soy sauce samples. For some brands, the entire range of observed levels was above or below the average concentration, although some brands had only a few samples. Furans levels of different lots within the same brand were generally comparable.
What do the survey results mean
For all product types, furan levels found in this survey were comparable to the data in the scientific literature and previous targeted surveysReference 6 Reference 7 Reference 8 Reference 9 Reference 10 Reference 11. Table 3 only compares levels for furan, as limited data is available concerning 2- and 3-methylfuran levels in foods and therefore no comparison on the presence of 2- and 3-methylfuran could be made.
The literature shows that 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran can form alongside furan from precursors found in foods, although limited data is available concerning specific precursors or reaction pathwaysReference 12 Reference 13. The variety of 2- and 3-methylfuran levels in foods sampled in this survey is possibly due to differences in ingredients and processing, which may favour the formation of different furan analogues.
|Product type||Study||Number of samples||Minimum (ppb)||Maximum (ppb)||Average (ppb)|
|Canned fish||CFIA survey, 2018 to 2019||50||1.62||64.4||16.9Table Note c|
|Canned fish||Crews et al., 2012Table Note g||37||<0.3||70||26|
|Canned fish||Kim et al., 2009Table Note h||29||0.4||212||39.1Table Note c|
|Heat treated fish||EFSA survey, 2004 to 2010Table Note i||47||<5||172||17|
|Canned fish||FDA survey, 2004Table Note j||6||3.25Table Note d||7.1||4.93|
|Canned meat||CFIA survey, 2018 to 2019||50||1.19||40||14Table Note c|
|Canned meat||Kim et al., 2009Table Note h||19||2.8||194||24.3Table Note c|
|Meat products||EFSA survey, 2004 to 2010Table Note i||147||<8||160||13-17Table Note e|
|Meat products||FDA survey, 2004Table Note j||9||3.25Table Note d||39.2||15.4Table Note c|
|Canned milk||CFIA survey, 2018 to 2019||16||1.27||20.8||6.87Table Note c|
|Canned milk||FDA survey, 2004Table Note j||3||10.9||15.3||12.5|
|Milk products||EFSA survey, 2004 to 2010Table Note i||64||<0.5||80||5-5.6Table Note e|
|Dried beverage||CFIA survey, 2018 to 2019||43||2.7||8.22||5.43Table Note c|
|Dried chocolate beverageTable Note f||FDA survey, 2004Table Note j||7||0.5Table Note f||0.8Table Note d Table Note f||0.76Table Note f|
|Dried dairy products||CFIA survey, 2018 to 2019||42||0||0||0|
|Baby formula powdered milk||Liu et al., 2018Table Note k||10||2.4||26.1||8.93|
|Soy sauce||CFIA survey, 2018 to 2019||50||1.09||159||38.5Table Note c|
|Soy sauce||Arisseto et al., 2009 to 2011Table Note l||46||6||138||28.2|
|Soy sauce||EFSA survey, 2004 to 2010Table Note i||94||<0.07||78||27|
|Soy sauce||FDA survey, 2004Table Note j||5||17.2||75.6||52.1|
- Table note c
Only positive results were used to calculate the average (hazard) levels.
- Table note d
Recorded value was between LOD and LOQ, so an average of LOD and LOQ is used.
- Table note e
A range indicates different results for the lower and upper bounds.
- Table note f
Commodity tested as it is consumed.
- Table note g
Crews, C., Pye, C. (2013). Furan in canned sardines and other fish. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part B, 7(1), pp. 43-45.
- Table note h
Kim, Y. M., Her, J.-Y., Kim, M.K., Lee, K.-G. (2015). Formation and reduction of furan in a soy sauce model system. Food Chemistry, 189, pp. 114-119.
- Table note i
Update on furan levels in food from monitoring years 2004-2010 and exposure assessment. (2011) Italy. European Food Safety Authority.
- Table note j
Exploratory Data on furan in Food. (2005). United States of America. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
- Table note k
Liu, Y.-T., Tsai, S.-W. (2010). Assessment of dietary furan exposures from heat processed foods in Taiwan. Chemosphere, 79(1), pp. 54-59.
- Table note l
Arisseto, A.P., Furlani, M.S., Pereira, A.L.D., Toledo, M.C.F., Ueno, M.S., Vincente, E. (2012). Occurrence of furan in commercial processed foods in Brazil. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A, 29(12), pp. 1832-1839.
The differences in canned fish furan levels between this survey and the other studies in Table 3 as well as the variety of reported levels within this survey might be caused by the differing levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (a precursor to furan) in fish, which has been shown to change depending on type and diet of fishReference 14. Among canned meats sampled in this and other surveys, differences in ingredients and degree of thermal processing may have contributed to the variety of observed furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran concentrations.
Dried beverage products sampled in other surveys were tested as-consumed whereas the CFIA tested dried beverages as-purchased. When a dilution factor is considered, furan levels in dried beverages from this survey are comparable to dried beverages included in other surveys.
Canned milk and soy sauce samples tested in this survey reported comparable furan levels to those reported in literature. Additionally, in this survey and in the literature, soy sauce samples generally contained more furan than other product types tested. This could be due to a process called "Maillard browning" which is often used in soy sauce manufacturing to enhance flavour and extend shelf-lifeReference 15 Reference 16. Maillard browning involves the Maillard reaction, which has been shown to be a formation pathway for furanReference 17.
HC's Bureau of Chemical Safety determined the levels of furan, 2-methylfuran and 3-methylfuran in food observed in this survey are not expected to pose a concern to human health; therefore no follow-up actions were required.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: