Ochratoxin A in Wheat Products, Oat Products, Rice Products and Other Grain Products - April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019
Summary
Targeted surveys provide information on potential food hazards and enhance the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA's) routine monitoring programs. These surveys provide evidence regarding the safety of the food supply, identify potential emerging hazards, and contribute new information and data to food categories where it may be limited or non-existent. They are often used by the Agency to focus surveillance on potential areas of higher risk. Surveys can also help to identify trends and provide information about how industry complies with Canadian regulations.
Wheat products, oat products, rice products, and other grains (for example, barley, quinoa) are consumed in varying degrees by some or all populations in Canada. These products can be naturally contaminated with mycotoxins, which are toxic secondary metabolites of fungi. Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a toxin released by mould that can grow on agricultural products as a result of warm, wet climate conditions during storage.
Considering the factors mentioned above and their relevance to Canadians, grains were selected for this targeted survey. The purpose of targeted surveys is to generate a snapshot of the occurrence and levels of chemical hazards in food. Over the course of this study (April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019), a total of 495 samples were collected from retail locations in 6 cities across Canada and tested for OTA.
OTA was found in 45% of samples tested. Wheat products, oat products, rice products, and kamut products (kamut is a type of wheat) are subject to a maximum level of 3 parts per billion (ppb), which has been proposed by Health Canada (HC) (see Appendix 1 for more information). The compliance rate for these products was 99.8% (n=420 samples). There are currently no established limits for OTA in other grains. Levels above historical results (previously submitted to HC and deemed safe) in the specific grains are reviewed by HC to determine if OTA levels are harmful to consumers. Levels in these samples did not pose a health risk to Canadian consumers and there were no product recalls resulting from this survey.
Overall, our survey results suggest that grains are safe for consumption. Regardless, these foods are a known potential source of OTA contamination and as such, safe handling practices are recommended for producers, retailers and consumers.
What are targeted surveys
Targeted surveys are used by the CFIA to focus its surveillance activities on areas of highest health risk. The information gained from these surveys provides support for the allocation and prioritization of the Agency's activities to areas of greater concern. Originally started as a project under the Food Safety Action Plan (FSAP), targeted surveys have been embedded in our regular surveillance activities since 2013. Targeted surveys are a valuable tool for generating information on certain hazards in foods, identifying and characterizing new and emerging hazards, informing trend analysis, prompting and refining health risk assessments, highlighting potential contamination issues, as well as assessing and promoting compliance with Canadian regulations.
Food safety is a shared responsibility. We work with federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments and provide regulatory oversight of the food industry to promote safe handling of foods throughout the food production chain. The food industry and retail sectors in Canada are responsible for the food they produce and sell, while individual consumers are responsible for the safe handling of the food they have in their possession.
Why did we conduct this survey
Chemical hazards in foods can come from a variety of sources. This report provides the results of a chemistry survey that was carried out to detect a toxin (ochratoxin A) produced by moulds. Various strains of Aspergillus and Penicillium moulds can infect foods in storage. Wet, warm weather conditions in storage will favour the development of OTAFootnote 1. OTA only forms after harvest and is most commonly found in in cereal grains (wheat, corn, oat, and barley), green coffee, grape juice, beer, wines, cocoa, dried fruits, and nutsFootnote 2. OTA is not easily destroyed by heating so it survives under normal cooking or processing conditionsFootnote 3,Footnote 4.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified OTA as a possible human carcinogenFootnote 5, especially in the kidneys. In animal studies, OTA has also been shown to have negative effects on the kidneys, the developing fetus, and the immune systemFootnote 5. HC completed a risk assessment for OTA, and as a result, has proposed maximum levels for OTA in various food commoditiesFootnote 6 as well as an industry guidance value for OTA in unprocessed cereal grainsFootnote 7.
The main objectives of this targeted survey were: to generate additional baseline surveillance data on the levels of OTA in foods not routinely monitored under other agency programs but available on the Canadian retail market; to assess compliance with proposed Canadian regulations; and to compare the prevalence of OTA in foods in this survey with that of previous targeted surveys, where possible.
What did we sample
A variety of domestic and imported wheat, oat, rice products, and products of other grains were sampled between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Samples were collected from local/regional retail locations located in 6 major cities across Canada. These cities encompassed 4 Canadian geographical areas: Atlantic (Halifax), Quebec (Montreal), Ontario (Toronto, Ottawa) and the West (Vancouver, and Calgary). The number of samples collected from these cities was in proportion to the relative population of the respective areas. The shelf life, storage conditions, and the cost of the food on the open market were not considered in this survey.
Product type | Sample types | Number of domestic samples | Number of imported samples | Number of samples of unspecified Table Note a origin | Total number of samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wheat | Baked goods, baking mixes, cookies, granola/cereals bars, breakfast/infant cereals, crackers, crispbreads, pasta | 23 | 62 | 111 | 196 |
Oat | Cookies, granola/cereals bars, breakfast cereals, cookies, crackers, bran, grain, oatmeal, oat products | 37 | 38 | 25 | 100 |
Rice | Grain, flavoured rice | 8 | 40 | 50 | 98 |
Buckwheat | Grain, groats, flour | 8 | 10 | 7 | 25 |
Kamut | Breakfast cereals, crackers, grain, flour, pasta | 3 | 7 | 16 | 26 |
Quinoa | Flour, grain, flakes, pasta | 5 | 7 | 13 | 25 |
Rye | Bread, crackers, crispbreads, flour, flakes | 9 | 5 | 11 | 25 |
Grand total | All | 93 | 169 | 233 | 495 |
Table Notes
- Table Note a
-
Unspecified refers to those samples for which the country of origin could not be assigned from the product label or available sample information.
How were samples analyzed and assessed
Samples were analyzed by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited food testing laboratory under contract with the Government of Canada. The results are based on the food products as sold and not necessarily as they would be consumed.
In 2009, HC proposed maximum levels (MLs) for OTA in a variety of foods. These MLs as well as an industry guidance value for OTA in unprocessed cereal grains are still under consideration and remain in "proposed" statusFootnote 7. The proposed Canadian standards and guidance value for OTA, and the established international maximum levels for OTA in foods are presented in Appendix 1.
In the absence of established tolerances or standards for OTA in foods, elevated levels of OTA in specific foods may be assessed by HC on a case-by-case basis using the most current scientific data available.
What were the survey results
Of the 495 samples that were tested, 55% were free from contamination by OTA. Of the 45% of samples where OTA was detected, there were various ranges of contamination as seen in Table 2. Average levels of OTA were highest in buckwheat, and lowest in rye products.
Product | Total number of samples | Number of positive samples | Number of samples with non-compliant/elevated levels | Min (ppb) | Max (ppb) | Average level (ppb) of positive results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buckwheat | 25 | 11 | 0 | 0.060 | 7.6 | 2.4 |
Kamut | 26 | 10 | 0 | 0.050 | 1.2 | 0.48 |
Oat | 100 | 55 | 0 | 0.050 | 1.6 | 0.26 |
Quinoa | 25 | 8 | 0 | 0.054 | 5.8 | 1.3 |
Rice | 98 | 13 | 1 | 0.049 | 11 | 1.1 |
Rye | 25 | 15 | 0 | 0.050 | 1.9 | 0.24 |
Wheat | 196 | 107 | 0 | 0.042 | 2.2 | 0.27 |
Only 1 (0.2%) sample had non-compliant/elevated levels of OTA. A sample of brown rice had a level of 11 ppb. The proposed maximum limit for rice is 3 ppb.
The results for the elevated sample, along with the entire dataset, were forwarded to HC for a safety assessment. Adverse health effects are associated with long-term exposure to OTA. Periodic, short-term exposures to elevated OTA levels in a limited number of foods would not be considered to pose a safety concern. HC is of the opinion that the levels of OTA in the products analyzed in this survey were unlikely to pose a health risk. No product recalls were warranted given the low risk to human health.
What do the survey results mean
In this survey, 55% of samples of selected foods analyzed were free of detectable levels of OTA. Tables 3-6 present a comparison of the maximum, minimum and average OTA levels in specific food categories observed in this study vs. previous agency surveysFootnote 8,Footnote 9,Footnote 10,Footnote 11,Footnote 12. Please note that only the detectable values of OTA were included in the calculation of the minimum, maximum and average OTA levels for agency surveys.
Food | Year | Number of samples | Number (%) of positive samples | Minimum OTA levels (ppb) | Maximum OTA levels (ppb) | Average OTA levels (ppb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baked goods | 2018-2019 | 1 | 1 (100) | n/a | 0.073 | n/a |
Baked goods | 2016-2017 | 100 | 64 (64) | 0.040 | 65 | 1.2 |
Baked goods | 2012-2014 | 48 | 48 (100) | 0.39 | 5.3 | 2.0 |
Baked goods | 2011-2012 | 19 | 13 (68) | 0.043 | 0.35 | 0.13 |
Baking mixes | 2018-2019 | 28 | 9 (32) | 0.051 | 0.46 | 0.16 |
Baking mixes | 2012-2014 | 247 | 163 (66) | 0.042 | 6.1 | 0.28 |
Granola/cereal bars | 2018-2019 | 9 | 6 (67) | 0.080 | 1.3 | 0.36 |
Breakfast cereal (wheat) | 2018-2019 | 31 | 13 (42) | 0.050 | 2.0 | 0.32 |
Breakfast cereal (wheat) | 2012-2014 | 361 | 208 (58) | 0.042 | 7.0 | 0.38 |
Breakfast cereal (wheat) | 2011-2012 | 80 | 59 (74) | 0.041 | 1.8 | 0.37 |
Breakfast cereal (wheat) | 2010-2011 | 56 | 26 (46) | 0.040 | 2.8 | 0.56 |
Infant cereal (wheat) | 2018-2019 | 28 | 5 (18) | 0.050 | 0.17 | 0.077 |
Infant cereal (wheat) | 2012-2014 | 259 | 111 (43) | 0.041 | 2.2 | 0.57 |
Infant cereal (wheat) | 2011-2012 | 25 | 9 (36) | 0.041 | 0.76 | 0.30 |
Infant cereal (wheat) | 2010-2011 | 10 | 1 (10) | n/a | 0.22 | n/a |
Infant cereal (wheat) | 2009-2010 | 75 | 19 (25) | 0.30 | 4.1 | 0.82 |
Cookies | 2018-2019 | 31 | 22 (71) | 0.042 | 1.0 | 0.23 |
Cookies | 2016-2017 | 198 | 136 (69) | 0.042 | 2.6 | 0.24 |
Cookies | 2012-2014 | 102 | 86 (84) | 0.041 | 4.4 | 0.23 |
Cookies | 2010-2011 | 30 | 20 (67) | 0.049 | 3.8 | 0.50 |
Crackers/Crispbreads | 2018-2019 | 40 | 30 (75) | 0.047 | 2.2 | 0.41 |
Crackers/Crispbreads | 2016-2017 | 100 | 73 (73) | 0.048 | 1.7 | 0.28 |
Crackers/Crispbreads | 2012-2014 | 147 | 121 (82) | 0.045 | 2.8 | 0.32 |
Crackers/Crispbreads | 2011-2012 | 10 | 10 (100) | 0.044 | 3.2 | 0.94 |
Pasta | 2018-2019 | 28 | 21 (75) | 0.049 | 0.34 | 0.18 |
Pasta | 2016-2017 | 262 | 132 (50) | 0.040 | 1.9 | 0.32 |
Pasta | 2012-2014 | 159 | 96 (60) | 0.041 | 2.8 | 0.26 |
n/a = not applicable
Year | Number of samples | Number (%) of positive samples | Minimum OTA levels (ppb) | Maximum OTA levels (ppb) | Average OTA levels (ppb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 100 | 55 (55) | 0.050 | 1.6 | 2.6 |
2012-2014 | 314 | 141 (45) | 0.040 | 21 | 0.9 |
2011-2012 | 31 | 22 (71) | 0.042 | 1.2 | 0.32 |
2010-2011 | 17 | 13 (76) | 0.042 | 0.74 | 0.23 |
Year | Number of samples | Number (%) of positive samples | Minimum OTA levels (ppb) | Maximum OTA levels (ppb) | Average OTA levels (ppb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 98 | 14 (14) | 0.049 | 11 | 1.1 |
2011-2012 | 1 | 1 (14) | n/a | 0.25 | n/a |
n/a = not applicable
Grain | Year | Number of samples | Number (%) of positive samples | Minimum OTA levels (ppb) | Maximum OTA levels (ppb) | Average OTA levels (ppb) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buck-wheat | 2018-2019 | 25 | 11 (44) | 0.060 | 7.6 | 2.4 |
Buck-wheat | 2017-2018 | 17 | 9 (53) | 0.050 | 3.3 | 0.70 |
Buck-wheat | 2012-2014 | 37 | 17 (46) | 0.052 | 5.3 | 0.88 |
Buck-wheat | 2011-2012 | 12 | 7 (58) | 0.11 | 29 | 5.3 |
Kamut | 2018-2019 | 26 | 10 (38) | 0.050 | 1.2 | 0.48 |
Kamut | 2017-2018 | 1 | 0 (0) | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Kamut | 2012-2014 | 33 | 8 (24) | 0.14 | 13 | 3.3 |
Kamut | 2011-2012 | 15 | 7 (47) | 0.047 | 2.3 | 1.0 |
Quinoa | 2018-2019 | 25 | 8 (32) | 0.054 | 5.8 | 1.3 |
Quinoa | 2017-2018 | 22 | 10 (45) | 0.043 | 1.3 | 0.52 |
Quinoa | 2012-2014 | 32 | 13 (41) | 0.12 | 12 | 2.6 |
Quinoa | 2011-2012 | 24 | 9 (38) | 0.045 | 0.70 | 0.25 |
Rye | 2018-2019 | 25 | 15 (60) | 0.050 | 1.9 | 0.24 |
Rye | 2017-2018 | 3 | 1 (33) | n/a | 0.36 | n/a |
Rye | 2012-2014 | 26 | 12 (46) | 0.045 | 6.7 | 1.6 |
Rye | 2011-2012 | 4 | 4 (100) | 0.068 | 2.4 | 0.98 |
n/a = not applicable
When examining the baseline data collected from 2009 to 2017, rice typically had very low prevalence and low levels of OTA. Wheat, oat and other grain products had relatively high OTA prevalence, and the levels were variable.
In general, the OTA prevalence and average levels in the current targeted survey data were comparable or lower than those recorded in previous targeted surveys, except for oat products, rice products and buckwheat products. The scientific studies purchased local products while the CFIA studies included samples from at least 28 countries. This may account for some of the differences.
The OTA levels in all samples were assessed by HC, who concluded that the levels of OTA found in the products analyzed in this survey did not pose a health concern. No product recalls were warranted given the lack of a health concern.
Appendix 1
Commodity | Canada Table Note b (proposed) – see ref 7 | United States | European Union | Codex |
---|---|---|---|---|
Raw/unprocessed cereal grains | 5 | Not specified to date | 5 | Not specified to date |
Grains for direct consumption | 3 | Not specified to date | 3 | Not specified to date |
Derived cereal products (for example, flour, bread, breakfast cereal) | 3 | Not specified to date | 3 | Not specified to date |
Wheat bran | 7 | Not specified to date | 3 | Not specified to date |
Cereal-based foods for infants and young children | 0.5 | Not specified to date | 0.5 | Not specified to date |
Wheat gluten not sold directly to the consumer | Not specified to date | Not specified to date | 8.0 | Not specified to date |
Table Notes
- Table Note b
-
Proposed maximum level by HC
Levels reflect latest regulations in the USAFootnote 13, European Union (EU)Footnote 14 and CodexFootnote 15
- Date modified: