Language selection

Search

Operational procedure: control response plan for molluscan shellfish test results exceeding Canadian maximum levels, standards or guidelines

On this page

1.0 Purpose

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) inspection staff on the CFIA control response when test results for Canadian molluscan shellfish (hereafter referred to as "shellfish") exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins ("biotoxins") and chemical contaminants in food, the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus.

This document is intended to be used in conjunction with other guidance documents as referenced in section 3.0.

The guidance below should be used whenever test results for shellfish samples collected at an establishment used by a CFIA licenced operator ("establishment") or from shellfish harvest areas ("harvest areas") exceed the Canadian maximum levels, standards or guidelines or the criteria for norovirus.

2.0 Authorities

The inspection powers, control actions and enforcement actions authorized by the above legislation are identified and explained in the Operational guideline – Food regulatory response guidelines.

3.0 Reference documents

4.0 Definitions

Definitions are located in the:

5.0 Acronyms

Acronyms are spelled out the first time they are used in this document and are consolidated in the Food business line acronyms list.

6.0 Operational guideline

When test results for shellfish samples collected at an establishment or from harvest areas exceed the Canadian maximum level, standard, guidelines, or the criteria for norovirus, a control response must be applied. Sections 6.1 to 6.7 provide control response scenarios associated with shellfish. Select the scenarios that apply and follow the steps as described.

Section 6.1: Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus

Section 6.2: Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus

Section 6.3: Control response triggered by the notification of an illness related to the consumption of shellfish

Section 6.4: Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins and chemical contaminants in food

Section 6.5: Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food

Section 6.6: Control response triggered by the notification that a chemical contamination event occurred in a harvest area or when test results for shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed Canadian maximum levels for chemical contaminants in food

Section 6.7: Control response for harvested shellfish upon notification of harvest areas placed in closed status

6.1 Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus

6.1.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When test results for shellfish samples collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual):

6.1.2 Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

6.1.2.1 Conduct a food safety investigation

Continue the food safety investigation following procedures described in the FIRP, if applicable.

6.1.2.2 Review the PCP information at the implicated establishments

Verify the CFIA licenced operator's compliance to the applicable requirements of their preventive control plan (PCP) by following the Standard inspection procedure (SIP).

Review the PCP implementation to determine if the licenced operator is operating in compliance.

Table 1: Decision-making process based on the PCP compliance
If Then
the PCP is in compliance
  • request the provincial or federal licencing authority to notify the leaseholder/harvester of the test results and obtain contact information so that sampling can be arranged
  • conduct shellfish sampling and testing activities at the implicated harvest areas, except for Vibrio parahaemolyticus
  • proceed to section 6.1.3: Determine the extent of the risk
the PCP is not in compliance and the source of contamination is at the establishment
  • no additional action is required at the harvest area
  • apply the SIP and address the non-compliance of the PCP
the PCP is not in compliance and the contamination source is inconclusive
  • apply the SIP and address the non-compliance of the PCP
  • decide, based on regional information, historical data and previous results, if shellfish sampling at the harvest areas is required, except for Vibrio parahaemolyticus
    • if shellfish sampling is not required:
      • no further action is required at the harvest areas
    • if shellfish sampling and testing at the harvest areas is required:

6.1.3 Determine the extent of the risk

Once it has been determined that shellfish sampling at the harvest areas is required, determine the number of shellfish samples which will be collected and the locations at which they will be collected.

Table 2: Decision-making process based on test results for shellfish samples collected at an establishment
If Then
test results exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for E. coli or Salmonella or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)
test results exceed the Canadian guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for Vibrio parahaemolyticus
  • no shellfish sampling at the harvest area is required
  • continue to apply the SIP and to address the non-compliance of the PCP
  • proceed to section 6.1.5: Close case

6.1.4 Implement strategies to mitigate risk at the harvest areas

Conduct shellfish sampling and testing activities at the harvest areas, if required.

Note

When CFIA's control response is triggered by the notification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus illnesses related to the consumption of shellfish or when test results for shellfish samples collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, CFIA's control response does not include additional sampling and testing of shellfish collected from harvest areas.

Table 3: Decision-making process based on test results for shellfish samples collected from harvest areas
If Then
test results do not exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)
  • no additional action is required at the harvest area
  • continue to apply the SIP and to address the non-compliance of the PCP
test results exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)

6.1.5 Close case

Close the case when the PCP inspection at an establishment and the food safety investigation are completed and the harvest areas are back in open status, if applicable.

6.2 Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus

Note

When CFIA's control response is triggered by the notification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus illnesses related to the consumption of shellfish or when test results for shellfish samples collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, CFIA's control response does not include additional sampling and testing of shellfish collected from harvest areas.

6.2.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When the test results of shellfish samples collected from a harvest area exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual), verify the status of the harvest area at the time of the harvest.

Table 4: Decision-making process based on the harvest area status at the time of harvest
If Then
harvest area was in closed status
  • continue to work with Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), as required, to inform the re-opening of the harvest area
harvest area was in open status
  • follow regional procedures for making a recommendation to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to close the implicated harvest area
    • Note: ECCC may also recommend to DFO to close the implicated harvest areas when: 1 – the Conditional management plan (CMP) criteria is not being met, 2 - unusual weather event occurred or 3 – an unplanned sewage discharge occurred
  • inform the CFIA licenced operators that a recommendation to DFO to close the harvest area has been sent, if applicable

6.2.2 Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

Complete section 6.7: Control response for harvested shellfish upon notification of harvest areas placed in closed status to determine if product is at the establishment or in distribution and then proceed to section 6.2.3: Determine the extent of the risk.

6.2.3 Determine the extent of the risk

6.2.3.1 Scope potential impact to shellfish in other harvest areas

Use regional knowledge and information to determine if the harvest area is representative of other harvest areas.

Table 5: Decision-making process based on the representativeness of the harvest area
If Then
harvest area is not representative of other harvest areas
harvest area is representative of other harvest areas

6.2.4 Implement strategies to mitigate risk at the harvest areas

The closure of harvest areas may be initiated by the CFIA (proceed to section 6.2.4.1; Closure initiated by the CFIA) or by ECCC (proceed to section 6.2.4.2; Closure initiated by ECCC).

6.2.4.1 Closure initiated by the CFIA

A closure resulting from test results for shellfish from a harvest area exceeding the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for E. coli or Salmonella is implemented as per section 6.3: Shellfish harvest area investigation – Unacceptable microbiological results in shellfish of the CSSP manual.

A closure resulting from test results for shellfish from a harvest area exceeding the criteria for norovirus is implemented as per section 6.4: Response to shellfish related illnesses and outbreaks of the CSSP manual.

The size of the closure is determined on a case by case basis.

Conduct shellfish sampling and testing activities at the harvest area, if required.

Table 6: Decision-making process based on shellfish samples test results when the closure is initiated by the CFIA
If Then
test results for shellfish collected at the harvest area exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for E. coli or Salmonella or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)
  • coordinate shellfish sampling and testing activities with ECCC to inform the re-opening of the areas in closed status, as required
  • follow regional procedures for making a recommendation to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to close the implicated harvest areas
  • continue to coordinate shellfish sampling and testing activities with ECCC, if applicable, to inform the re-opening of the areas in closed status
  • proceed to section 6.2.5: Close case
test results for shellfish collected at the harvest area do not exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for E. coli or Salmonella or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)
6.2.4.2 Closure initiated by ECCC

A closure recommended by ECCC for a specific event will be implemented as per section 6.1 – Conditional management of shellfish harvest areas and section 6.2 – Emergency events of the CSSP Manual.

Following a closure recommendation by ECCC, coordinate shellfish sampling and testing activities with ECCC to inform the re-opening of the harvest areas in closed status.

Table 7: Decision-making process based on shellfish samples test results when the closure is initiated by ECCC
If Then
test results of the shellfish collected at the harvest area exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for E. coli or Salmonella
  • continue to coordinate shellfish sampling and testing activities with ECCC, as required, to inform the re-opening of the harvest areas in closed status
test results of the shellfish collected at the harvest area do not exceed the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods for E. coli or Salmonella

6.2.5 Close case

Close the case once the harvest areas are back in open status.

6.3 Control response triggered by the notification of an illness related to the consumption of shellfish

Note

In this scenario, there will be ongoing communication with public health authorities' representatives throughout the control response.

6.3.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When the CFIA receives information suggesting a potential epidemiological association between illnesses and shellfish consumption:

Proceed to section 6.4 and section 6.5 of this document when it is determined that the illness is linked to biotoxins in shellfish;

Or

Proceed to section 6.1 and section 6.2 of this document when it is determined that the illness is linked to microbiological agents, excluding norovirus, in shellfish;

Or

Apply the CFIA program policy (section 6.4 – Response to shellfish related illnesses and outbreaks of the CSSP manual) when it is determined that the illness is linked to norovirus in shellfish and proceed to section 6.1 and section 6.2 of this document.

6.4 Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected at an establishment exceed Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins and chemical contaminants in food

6.4.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When test results of shellfish samples collected at an establishment exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins and chemical contaminants in food:

Table 8: Decision-making process based on the status of the harvest area at the time of harvest
If Then
harvest area was in closed status
harvest area was in open status

6.4.2 Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

6.4.2.1 Conduct a food safety investigation

Conduct a food safety investigation following procedures described in the FIRP, if required.

6.4.2.2 Review the PCP information at the implicated establishment

Verify the CFIA licenced operator's compliance to the applicable requirements of their preventive control plan (PCP) by following the Standard inspection procedure (SIP).

Review the PCP implementation to determine if the licensed operator is operating in compliance.

6.4.3 Determine the extent of the risk

Proceed to section 6.5.3: Determine the extent of the risk for the control response triggered when shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food to continue this control response.

6.5 Control response triggered when test results for shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food

6.5.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When test results of shellfish samples collected from a harvest area exceed Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food:

Table 9: Decision-making process based on the status of the harvest area at the time of harvest
If Then
harvest area was in closed status
harvest area was in open status
  • immediately follow regional procedures for making a recommendation to Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) to close the harvest areas
  • inform the CFIA licenced operators that a recommendation to DFO to close the harvest areas has been sent, if applicable
  • conduct shellfish sampling and testing activities at the harvest areas to inform the re-opening of the harvest areas
  • proceed to section 6.5.2: Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

6.5.2 Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

Complete section 6.7: Control response for harvested shellfish upon notification of harvest areas placed in closed status to determine if product is at the establishment or in distribution and then proceed to section 6.5.3. Determine the extent of the risk.

6.5.3 Determine the extent of the risk

6.5.3.1 Scope potential impact to shellfish in other harvest areas

Use regional knowledge and information to determine if the harvest area is representative of other harvest areas, as outlined in the regional marine biotoxin monitoring plan.

Table 10: Decision-making process based on the representativeness of the harvest area
If Then
harvest area is not representative of other harvest areas
harvest area is representative of other harvest areas
  • immediately follow regional procedures for making a recommendation to DFO to close the harvest areas
  • inform the CFIA licenced operators that a recommendation to DFO to close the harvest areas has been sent, if applicable
  • conduct shellfish sampling and testing activities at the harvest areas to inform the re-opening of the harvest areas
  • if required, conduct additional shellfish sampling and testing activities at the harvest areas
  • continue to 6.5.4: Implement strategies to mitigate risk at the harvest areas

6.5.4 Implement strategies to mitigate risk at the harvest areas

A closure resulting from shellfish from a harvest area exceeding the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food is implemented as per section 4.2.1 Harvest area monitoring of the CSSP Manual. The size of the closure is determined based on the factors outlined in the regional marine biotoxin monitoring plan.

For the purpose of defining the 14 day period, the first sample is taken on day 1 and the third sample is taken no earlier than day 14.

Harvest areas placed in closed status based on the predicted rapid rise in biotoxin levels (precautionary closure) may be placed in open status earlier than 14 days from the day it was placed in closed status if subsequent samples for the same harvest areas indicate that the biotoxin levels never exceeded the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food.

Table 11: Decision-making process based on shellfish samples test results
If Then
test results exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food
  • continue shellfish sampling and testing activities to inform the re-opening of the harvest areas
test results do not exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins in food
  • consider test results for shellfish samples collected in adjacent harvest areas when making the decision to send a recommendation to DFO
  • follow regional procedures and make a recommendation to DFO to revoke the closure of the harvest areas

6.5.5 Close case

Close the case once the harvest areas are back in open status.

6.6 Control response triggered by the notification that a chemical contamination event occurred in a harvest area or when when test results for shellfish collected from a harvest area exceed Canadian maximum levels for chemical contaminants in food

When one of the Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program (CSSP) partners (CFIA, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) or Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO)) becomes aware of a suspected or potential chemical contamination event which may impact harvest areas, they will inform their CSSP regional counterparts as well as the Regional Interdepartmental Shellfish Committee (RISC) Chair for the appropriate follow-up discussions amongst CSSP partners as per the CSSP – chemical contamination management process (2019) (Internal access only – RDIMS 11318543).

6.6.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When inspection staff are informed that a chemical contamination event which may impact shellfish safety occurred:

Table 12: Decision-making process based on RISC decision
If Then
the RISC determines that the harvest area will not be placed in closed status
the RISC determines that the harvest area will be placed in closed status

6.6.2 Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

Complete section 6.7: Control response for harvested shellfish upon notification of harvest areas placed in closed status to determine if product is at the establishment or in distribution and then proceed to section 6.6.3: Determine the extent of the risk.

6.6.3 Determine the extent of the risk

6.6.3.1 Scope potential impact on shellfish in other harvest areas

Use regional knowledge and information on the extent of the contamination to determine if the harvest area is representative of other harvest areas.

Table 13: Decision-making process based on the representativeness of the harvest area
If Then
harvest area is not representative of other harvest areas
harvest area is representative of other harvest areas

6.6.4 Implement strategies to mitigate risk at the harvest areas

6.6.4.1 Chemical contamination event (except hydrocarbon contamination)

A closure resulting from a chemical contamination event (except hydrocarbon contamination) is managed on a case-by-case basis.

For further guidance regarding shellfish sampling and testing contact the Operational Guidance and Expertise (OGE) Division by submitting an electronic Request for Action Form (e-RAF).

6.6.4.2 Hydrocarbon contamination event

A closure resulting from a hydrocarbon contamination event is managed on a case-by-case basis. The period for which harvest areas will be in closed status is determined by the extent of the hydrocarbon contamination event and the length of time of the contamination, but will be for a minimum of 7 days. Once the CSSP partners consider the event to be over, the CFIA will conduct organoleptic analysis on the shellfish to determine potential continuous food safety concerns.

Table 14: Decision-making process based on shellfish samples organoleptic analysis
If Then
organoleptic analysis results are unsatisfactory
  • continue shellfish sampling and analysis activities at an appropriate frequency in an effort to concur with the recommendation to DFO (from one of the CSSP partners or the RISC chair) or to recommend to DFO to revoke the closure of the harvest areas
organoleptic analysis results are satisfactory
  • consider organoleptic analysis results for shellfish samples collected in adjacent harvest areas if applicable, before concurring with the recommendation to DFO (from one of the CSSP partners or the RISC chair) or recommending to DFO to revoke the closure of the harvest areas

6.6.5 Close case

Close the case once the food safety concerns have been addressed and the harvest areas are back in open status, if applicable.

6.7 Control response for harvested shellfish upon notification of harvest areas placed in closed status

6.7.1 Conduct preliminary assessment

When harvest areas are placed in closed status:

6.7.2 Conduct a source and risk factor (SRF) investigation

6.7.2.1 Identify all shellfish potentially impacted

Inform all appropriate CFIA licenced operator(s) that harvest areas are in closed status. Include the reason for the closure, the date of the last satisfactory monitoring results, if applicable, and the species of concern.

Request the following information from the CFIA licenced operator(s) impacted by the harvest area closures:

6.7.2.2 Conduct a food safety investigation

Consult the FIRP to determine if a food safety investigation is needed.

6.7.3 Determine the extent of the risk

Review information provided by CFIA licenced operator(s).

Table 15: Decision-making process based on shellfish at the CFIA licenced operator
If Then
CFIA licenced operator did not receive shellfish from the harvest areas placed in closed status
CFIA licenced operator has shellfish from the harvest areas in closed status in inventory but not in distribution
CFIA licenced operator has shellfish from the harvest areas in closed status and shellfish is in distribution

6.7.4 Implement risk mitigation strategies

Conduct shellfish sampling and testing activities at the CFIA licenced operator, if required.

Table 16: Decision-making process based on shellfish samples test results
If Then
test results do not exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins and chemical contaminants in food or the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for norovirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)
test results exceed the Canadian maximum levels for marine biotoxins and chemical contaminants in food or the Canadian standards and guidelines for microbiological safety of foods or the criteria for nororvirus (section 6.4 of CSSP manual)
  • request from the CFIA licenced operator that shellfish be segregated and controlled if required
  • take necessary actions to control any remaining product of the lot(s) as described in the Operational guideline - Food regulatory response guidelines, if required
  • verify the CFIA licenced operator's compliance to the applicable requirements of their preventive control plan (PCP) as per the Standard inspection procedure (SIP), if required
  • review the PCP implementation to determine if the licensed operator is operating in compliance, if required
  • take appropriate action following the SIP
  • continue the food safety investigation using the FIRP, if required
  • proceed to section 6.7.5: Close case

6.7.5 Close case

Close the case when all follow-up actions are completed.

For general inquiries related to this Operational Guidance Document, please follow established communication channels, including submitting an electronic Request for Action Form (e-RAF).

Date modified: